Re: [PATCH net-next] net: netem: use a list in addition to rbtree

[Peter Oskolkov <posk@google.com>]

Thanks, Stephen!

I don't care much about braces either. David, do you want me to send a
new patch with braces moved around?

On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 9:56 AM Stephen Hemminger
<stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:
>
> I like this, it makes a lot of sense since packets are almost
> always queued in order.
>
> Minor style stuff you might want to fix (but don't have to).
>
> > +                             if (!last ||
> > +                                 t_last->time_to_send > last->time_to_send) {
> > +                                     last = t_last;
> > +                             }
>
> I don't think you need braces here for single assignment.
>
> > +static void netem_erase_head(struct netem_sched_data *q, struct sk_buff *skb)
> > +{
> > +     if (skb == q->t_head) {
> > +             q->t_head = skb->next;
> > +             if (!q->t_head)
> > +                     q->t_tail = NULL;
> > +     } else
> > +             rb_erase(&skb->rbnode, &q->t_root);
>
> Checkpatch wants both sides of if/else to have brackets.
> Personally, don't care.
>
> Reviewed-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>