From: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@canonical.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>,
Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
w.bumiller@proxmox.com,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Jiri Benc <jbenc@redhat.com>,
Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/1 v4] rtnetlink: require unique netns identifier
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2018 23:55:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPP7u0XPASDL1t5yJ8nGF9jnkxSBowyMWEYvi8m--6DF2s93GA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180208.143356.2044831753683027153.davem@davemloft.net>
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 8:33 PM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> From: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
> Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 13:53:20 +0100
>
>> Since we've added support for IFLA_IF_NETNSID for RTM_{DEL,GET,SET,NEW}LINK
>> it is possible for userspace to send us requests with three different
>> properties to identify a target network namespace. This affects at least
>> RTM_{NEW,SET}LINK. Each of them could potentially refer to a different
>> network namespace which is confusing. For legacy reasons the kernel will
>> pick the IFLA_NET_NS_PID property first and then look for the
>> IFLA_NET_NS_FD property but there is no reason to extend this type of
>> behavior to network namespace ids. The regression potential is quite
>> minimal since the rtnetlink requests in question either won't allow
>> IFLA_IF_NETNSID requests before 4.16 is out (RTM_{NEW,SET}LINK) or don't
>> support IFLA_NET_NS_{PID,FD} (RTM_{DEL,GET}LINK) in the first place.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
>
> Applied, thanks Christian.
Thanks for applying, David.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-08 22:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-07 12:53 [PATCH net 0/1 v4] rtnetlink: require unique netns identifier Christian Brauner
2018-02-07 12:53 ` [PATCH net 1/1 " Christian Brauner
2018-02-07 13:20 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-02-07 13:36 ` Christian Brauner
2018-02-07 13:53 ` Jiri Benc
2018-02-08 19:33 ` David Miller
2018-02-08 22:55 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAPP7u0XPASDL1t5yJ8nGF9jnkxSBowyMWEYvi8m--6DF2s93GA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=christian.brauner@canonical.com \
--cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=jbenc@redhat.com \
--cc=ktkhai@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=w.bumiller@proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).