From: "Nicholas Piggin" <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: "Aaron Conole" <aconole@redhat.com>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <dev@openvswitch.org>,
"Ilya Maximets" <imaximet@redhat.com>,
"Eelco Chaudron" <echaudro@redhat.com>,
"Flavio Leitner" <fbl@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [RFC PATCH 4/7] net: openvswitch: ovs_vport_receive reduce stack usage
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2023 17:00:24 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CVV7HCQYCVOP.2JVVJCKU57CAW@wheely> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f7tfs2ymi8y.fsf@redhat.com>
On Fri Sep 29, 2023 at 1:26 AM AEST, Aaron Conole wrote:
> Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Dynamically allocating the sw_flow_key reduces stack usage of
> > ovs_vport_receive from 544 bytes to 64 bytes at the cost of
> > another GFP_ATOMIC allocation in the receive path.
> >
> > XXX: is this a problem with memory reserves if ovs is in a
> > memory reclaim path, or since we have a skb allocated, is it
> > okay to use some GFP_ATOMIC reserves?
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
> > ---
>
> This represents a fairly large performance hit. Just my own quick
> testing on a system using two netns, iperf3, and simple forwarding rules
> shows between 2.5% and 4% performance reduction on x86-64. Note that it
> is a simple case, and doesn't involve a more involved scenario like
> multiple bridges, tunnels, and internal ports. I suspect such cases
> will see even bigger hit.
>
> I don't know the impact of the other changes, but just an FYI that the
> performance impact of this change is extremely noticeable on x86
> platform.
Thanks for the numbers. This patch is probably the biggest perf cost,
but unfortunately it's also about the biggest saving. I might have an
idea to improve it.
Thanks,
Nick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-29 7:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-27 0:13 [RFC PATCH 0/7] net: openvswitch: Reduce stack usage Nicholas Piggin
2023-09-27 0:13 ` [RFC PATCH 1/7] net: openvswitch: Move NSH buffer out of do_execute_actions Nicholas Piggin
2023-09-27 8:26 ` [ovs-dev] " Ilya Maximets
2023-09-27 10:03 ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-09-27 0:13 ` [RFC PATCH 2/7] net: openvswitch: Reduce execute_push_nsh stack overhead Nicholas Piggin
2023-09-27 0:13 ` [RFC PATCH 3/7] net: openvswitch: uninline action execution Nicholas Piggin
2023-09-27 0:13 ` [RFC PATCH 4/7] net: openvswitch: ovs_vport_receive reduce stack usage Nicholas Piggin
2023-09-28 15:26 ` [ovs-dev] " Aaron Conole
2023-09-29 7:00 ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2023-09-29 8:38 ` Eelco Chaudron
2023-10-04 7:11 ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-10-04 15:15 ` Aaron Conole
2023-10-05 2:01 ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-10-11 13:34 ` Aaron Conole
2023-10-11 23:58 ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-10-04 7:29 ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-10-04 15:16 ` Aaron Conole
2023-09-27 0:13 ` [RFC PATCH 5/7] net: openvswitch: uninline ovs_fragment to control " Nicholas Piggin
2023-09-27 0:13 ` [RFC PATCH 6/7] net: openvswitch: Reduce ovs_fragment " Nicholas Piggin
2023-09-27 0:13 ` [RFC PATCH 7/7] net: openvswitch: Reduce stack usage in ovs_dp_process_packet Nicholas Piggin
2023-09-27 8:36 ` [ovs-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/7] net: openvswitch: Reduce stack usage Ilya Maximets
2023-09-28 1:52 ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-10-02 11:54 ` Ilya Maximets
2023-10-04 9:56 ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-09-29 7:06 ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-10-02 11:56 ` Ilya Maximets
2023-10-03 13:31 ` Aaron Conole
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CVV7HCQYCVOP.2JVVJCKU57CAW@wheely \
--to=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@openvswitch.org \
--cc=echaudro@redhat.com \
--cc=fbl@redhat.com \
--cc=imaximet@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).