From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wm1-f44.google.com (mail-wm1-f44.google.com [209.85.128.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EED52366DAE for ; Thu, 5 Mar 2026 12:42:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.44 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772714560; cv=none; b=OHirnfCr5gMrKWJQ+bAQdbrXSDvHFPTPI2/4olwjbieYSemlxVYMPXt7tQLcRm9LSC6zrtOMuybVi/3s2QLBunTSz9f/BBHUGgqLYS7DSEhFP8tJp0ATsVDZkfQaQL3DmcyzW+HRUmOnCKA5rj6LIMMm2x2H3GOtGtrKYicKqbM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772714560; c=relaxed/simple; bh=F8woh9js9XcHNLC38nopuCN1xsLDX1k03bkw/YemlEE=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:From:Subject:Cc:To: References:In-Reply-To; b=UOmYP0NYJwyAAkbACVnus8pUgAta8jALoHFGCwphd7xhhHbojc9TDwEJTHDHECJpSVeBfgdJB5AAm3ZvhyVQ1vErBtMkxkKvY2QGiIXed3YmgRNhDpI/aI04CBC6tyTtzQuhK2CWJdfvPnTODdNrNpLz7NIGRjssBMmX8Xo961o= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b=JremhocD; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.44 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b="JremhocD" Received: by mail-wm1-f44.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-48336a6e932so49962225e9.3 for ; Thu, 05 Mar 2026 04:42:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=google; t=1772714557; x=1773319357; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:references:to:cc:subject:from:message-id:date :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=F8woh9js9XcHNLC38nopuCN1xsLDX1k03bkw/YemlEE=; b=JremhocDidVGA9xi2y+kd6lN4USCRKAt0hsXie3N2VYF2p1DLBtH7vn7irPYWhPMog 7QjQ2vXbfAd9z+OtIB/domBtDenOuqYmQe1aGy308qoGHQB8I9Bdey/PEVBt75OimgVm ZNMPd1mGcYQMqRtHqK0ayTcs0Cuxy875aP/iLp1xPfg1n2vQz+lUVUMXxxe1NFPSYAkP oJ+uTJl82NqRfS3q0x0dXxcnHrCTvwhLtj//S+P+66Tp03+VQu6cYwlWQLnZLgsPAlSX KvizdPU2C89TD9h0Tgk2zWLfUlg5zB7LPHN9+hmZRRUzk6HoH8zPP5U7gTqFLNrs57oC lytA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1772714557; x=1773319357; h=in-reply-to:references:to:cc:subject:from:message-id:date :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=F8woh9js9XcHNLC38nopuCN1xsLDX1k03bkw/YemlEE=; b=XH7FEgJvAgU5Lpr/0FUC+Fy7cV2aeaBXhXsZgVUCVQSTl/qdniMDL1usiGve7pyZAA K64qrBn0uhANvFO9pgsUR2ragsuWPVfz1c9rSYq6EMG/f4K3mr2irnqO9wK8x9gtKtIb 8tFGDy+C19pbQrc+/UFBXMw7UUaHIUI7muu8L22roXv0/WQHfs51OVwDcl3FZEy0ZGl3 bPwKNqSOrxYUKwPtppBAjlFr9ZGk4dePlPAOiqI1bZcrDwHTpRXDgjBa+ND3Gz9OeS0Y OEqMqDLo8aZfifRZAo0MTbeI/kCjbMCFZJIoN4lqmRKHb1qyVqsnDQvGTD1VfOxUqMac 8E9w== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUEUeGnv3c0jdlkKQ8Q5luO/elBpQP4qWqhmUwh2j3KWmvszmVj3zdA0guhEM+m9sHA15nd3Lc=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyBM//ixY9CZMQbYjXgcxicAWt/2NKAEga+juBgJS/mGQm9ltww V/GfMLKn9RMn3ef36MO6+HqYdYFu1Pex8Z3OK4OFudKwvsYg0tK6FugfzK65j2HhPa0= X-Gm-Gg: ATEYQzxFjk27pefoQCwFRpNdsMUHHUByy/LmXfPfKcdt+6SBme7IzX/6HNKqszxbhqB Bqe4kHamOns5mZLiOzRmVY+s+Wzi3+gDmFTUaXjZ/scxazGAtPHs2qdw4yLbTC/kb6IJUT+d9eZ T56O6SZkD/KM4aWDb1CqrNnE/HTuqTvfJvb/TlgIjETNy1OXSO1TzcCiVY/EfhXbkIWAnJ/c23I oCNGzX2nmjwouE27o6EFkC3+eLzlYwnG9tifGF5EWgT/tvRbfOcDMSnoGMoE10FauwRPDP5f3Mj ui8vv6My1zSqaoW+Tez4uzFEJzJH9u0QO3bv1fMMoFewbielOgMqVaubOfSU7ykxgFC5/1KnQuf 4ZddzGHo0sP0Lk7FEPuT/e+JRwncCSePVUpEL97ebo7m4hrLdQQ58yg3b0TofWJvBnK5LqjQA6d gzmSdgRYv9uA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:470d:b0:47e:e87f:4bba with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-485198a2b1emr99378065e9.29.1772714557221; Thu, 05 Mar 2026 04:42:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([189.99.238.164]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ada2fe7eead31-5ffaa208aeesm5252381137.12.2026.03.05.04.42.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 05 Mar 2026 04:42:36 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2026 09:42:33 -0300 Message-Id: From: =?utf-8?b?UmljYXJkbyBCLiBNYXJsacOocmU=?= Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/3] bpf: bpf_out_neigh_v4: Fix nd_tbl NULL dereference when IPv6 is disabled Cc: "Fernando Fernandez Mancera" , "David Ahern" , =?utf-8?b?UmljYXJkbyBCLiBNYXJsacOocmU=?= , "Martin KaFai Lau" , "John Fastabend" , "Stanislav Fomichev" , "Alexei Starovoitov" , "Andrii Nakryiko" , "Eduard Zingerman" , "Song Liu" , "Yonghong Song" , "KP Singh" , "Hao Luo" , "Jiri Olsa" , "David S. Miller" , "Eric Dumazet" , "Paolo Abeni" , "Simon Horman" , =?utf-8?q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= , "Jay Vosburgh" , "Andrew Lunn" , "Hangbin Liu" , , , To: "Jakub Kicinski" , "Daniel Borkmann" X-Mailer: aerc 0.21.0-120-g50bad16c3d41-dirty References: <20260228-net-nd_tbl_fixes-v1-0-2b2a274df9bb@suse.com> <20260228-net-nd_tbl_fixes-v1-1-2b2a274df9bb@suse.com> <0b52257d-d557-4f26-9931-34c81ab621bc@iogearbox.net> <20260302171131.28373ccb@kernel.org> <0d7bb5c5-4122-4dc9-b52b-c305591207d1@suse.de> <525dab04-4e64-49cf-94d9-12084e146b80@iogearbox.net> <20260304174327.0a48ff45@kernel.org> <20260304185056.4ef945d4@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260304185056.4ef945d4@kernel.org> On Wed Mar 4, 2026 at 11:50 PM -03, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Thu, 5 Mar 2026 02:59:27 +0100 Daniel Borkmann wrote: >> >> I presume you mean disable_ipv6_mod which then bails out during the m= odule >> >> load process without error, right? It could be deprecated with a warn= ing so >> >> that it turns into a no-op: =20 >> >=20 >> > I believe disabling ipv6 may be legit. Some admins on ipv4 networks ma= y >> > be paranoid and not want to allow any ipv6 traffic if their "firewalls= " >> > can only understand IPv6? This is just a guess on my side, but I'm les= s >> > confident of deprecating the disable knob than =3Dm. I'd be happy if I= 'm >> > wrong. >> >=20 >> > To answer the earlier question -- I would prefer to take the fixes now >> > and make IPv6 bool in net-next, feels like too big of a change for rc3 >> > :( =20 >>=20 >> Makes sense, I think starting this process via net-next is fine and can = be >> better justified. Fernando, maybe in that case resend with the unlikely(= ) >> added. > > I think Fernando was chiming in because he sent similar patches. > Ricardo, please respin checking ipv6_mod_disabled() ? Will do, thank you all for reviewing.