From: "Emil Tsalapatis" <emil@etsalapatis.com>
To: "Leon Hwang" <leon.hwang@linux.dev>, <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Simon Horman" <horms@kernel.org>,
"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
"Eduard Zingerman" <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Martin KaFai Lau" <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
"Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi" <memxor@gmail.com>,
"Song Liu" <song@kernel.org>,
"Yonghong Song" <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
"Jiri Olsa" <jolsa@kernel.org>, "Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
"Guillaume Nault" <gnault@redhat.com>,
"Ido Schimmel" <idosch@nvidia.com>,
"Fernando Fernandez Mancera" <fmancera@suse.de>,
"Peter Oskolkov" <posk@google.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>, <kernel-patches-bot@fb.com>,
"Leon Hwang" <leon.huangfu@shopee.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v3 1/2] bpf: Update transport_header when encapsulating UDP tunnel in lwt
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2026 13:03:52 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DIXVJ45H90X3.3DOQOUXJB6DVN@etsalapatis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260601150203.20352-2-leon.hwang@linux.dev>
On Mon Jun 1, 2026 at 11:02 AM EDT, Leon Hwang wrote:
> Currently, bpf_lwt_push_ip_encap() does not update skb->transport_header.
> When a driver, e.g. ice, reuses the stale skb->transport_header to
> offload checksum computation to NIC hardware, VxLAN packets encapsulated
> by bpf_lwt_push_encap() helper may be dropped due to incorrect checksum.
>
> Update skb->transport_header in bpf_lwt_push_ip_encap() whenever the
> encapsulated packet uses UDP, so checksum offload works correctly.
>
> Fixes: 52f278774e79 ("bpf: implement BPF_LWT_ENCAP_IP mode in bpf_lwt_push_encap")
> Cc: Leon Hwang <leon.huangfu@shopee.com>
> Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
> ---
> net/core/lwt_bpf.c | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/lwt_bpf.c b/net/core/lwt_bpf.c
> index f71ef82a5f3d..65d1dfbf3312 100644
> --- a/net/core/lwt_bpf.c
> +++ b/net/core/lwt_bpf.c
> @@ -599,6 +599,7 @@ static int handle_gso_encap(struct sk_buff *skb, bool ipv4, int encap_len)
>
> int bpf_lwt_push_ip_encap(struct sk_buff *skb, void *hdr, u32 len, bool ingress)
> {
> + bool is_udp_tunnel;
> struct iphdr *iph;
> bool ipv4;
> int err;
> @@ -612,10 +613,16 @@ int bpf_lwt_push_ip_encap(struct sk_buff *skb, void *hdr, u32 len, bool ingress)
> ipv4 = true;
> if (unlikely(len < iph->ihl * 4))
> return -EINVAL;
> + is_udp_tunnel = iph->protocol == IPPROTO_UDP;
> + if (unlikely(is_udp_tunnel && len < iph->ihl * 4 + sizeof(struct udphdr)))
> + return -EINVAL;
> } else if (iph->version == 6) {
> ipv4 = false;
> if (unlikely(len < sizeof(struct ipv6hdr)))
> return -EINVAL;
> + is_udp_tunnel = ((struct ipv6hdr *)iph)->nexthdr == NEXTHDR_UDP;
> + if (unlikely(is_udp_tunnel && len < sizeof(struct ipv6hdr) + sizeof(struct udphdr)))
> + return -EINVAL;
> } else {
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> @@ -637,6 +644,10 @@ int bpf_lwt_push_ip_encap(struct sk_buff *skb, void *hdr, u32 len, bool ingress)
> if (ingress)
> skb_postpush_rcsum(skb, iph, len);
> skb_reset_network_header(skb);
> + if (ipv4 && is_udp_tunnel)
> + skb_set_transport_header(skb, skb_network_offset(skb) + iph->ihl * 4);
> + else if (!ipv4 && is_udp_tunnel)
> + skb_set_transport_header(skb, skb_network_offset(skb) + sizeof(struct ipv6hdr));
Minor nit: Could we do something like
if (is_udp_tunnel) {
size_t hrdsz = ipv4 ? iph->ihl * 4 : sizeof(struct ipv6hdr);
skb_set_transport_header(skb9, skb_network_offset(skb)) + hdrsz;
}
to make the logic clearer?
> memcpy(skb_network_header(skb), hdr, len);
> bpf_compute_data_pointers(skb);
> skb_clear_hash(skb);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-01 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-01 15:02 [PATCH bpf v3 0/2] bpf: Update transport_header when encapsulating UDP tunnel in lwt Leon Hwang
2026-06-01 15:02 ` [PATCH bpf v3 1/2] " Leon Hwang
2026-06-01 15:28 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-06-01 15:33 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-06-01 15:45 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-01 17:03 ` Emil Tsalapatis [this message]
2026-06-01 15:02 ` [PATCH bpf v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add tests to verify the fix of encapsulating VxLAN " Leon Hwang
2026-06-01 18:24 ` Emil Tsalapatis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DIXVJ45H90X3.3DOQOUXJB6DVN@etsalapatis.com \
--to=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fmancera@suse.de \
--cc=gnault@redhat.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-patches-bot@fb.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leon.huangfu@shopee.com \
--cc=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=posk@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox