From: "Emil Tsalapatis" <emil@etsalapatis.com>
To: "Jose Fernandez (Anthropic)" <jose.fernandez@linux.dev>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Neal Cardwell" <ncardwell@google.com>,
"Kuniyuki Iwashima" <kuniyu@google.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Simon Horman" <horms@kernel.org>,
"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
"Yonghong Song" <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
"Martin KaFai Lau" <martin.lau@linux.dev>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<bpf@vger.kernel.org>, "Ben Cressey" <ben@cressey.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: tcp: Fix use-after-free in bpf_iter_tcp_established_batch()
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2026 03:37:51 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DJLD0ZG9V0D8.HLAXEIVG8HSP@etsalapatis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260620-bpf-iter-tcp-refcnt-v1-1-883bf9e69495@linux.dev>
On Fri Jun 19, 2026 at 8:32 PM EDT, Jose Fernandez (Anthropic) wrote:
> reqsk_queue_hash_req() publishes a TCP_NEW_SYN_RECV request_sock onto
> the ehash chain (via inet_ehash_insert(), which drops the bucket lock on
> return) and only afterwards refcount_set()s rsk_refcnt to 3.
>
> Lockless readers such as __inet_lookup_established() account for this by
> using refcount_inc_not_zero(), but bpf_iter_tcp_established_batch() uses
> plain sock_hold() while holding the bucket lock, on the assumption that
> the lock guarantees sk_refcnt > 0. That assumption does not hold for
> request_sock:
>
> CPU 0 CPU 1
> ----- -----
> tcp_conn_request()
> reqsk_queue_hash_req()
> inet_ehash_insert(req)
> spin_lock(bucket)
> __sk_nulls_add_node_rcu(req) // rsk_refcnt == 0
> spin_unlock(bucket)
> bpf_iter_tcp_established_batch()
> spin_lock(bucket)
> sock_hold(req) <-- addition on 0
> spin_unlock(bucket)
> refcount_set(&req->rsk_refcnt, 3) // clobbers saturated value
>
> which surfaces as:
>
> refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free.
> WARNING: lib/refcount.c:25 at refcount_warn_saturate+0x48/0x90, CPU#1
> Call Trace:
> bpf_iter_tcp_established_batch+0x14e/0x170
> bpf_iter_tcp_batch+0x53/0x200
> bpf_iter_tcp_seq_next+0x27/0x70
> bpf_seq_read+0x107/0x410
> vfs_read+0xb9/0x380
>
> refcount_warn_saturate() then saturates the count, the publishing CPU's
> refcount_set() clobbers it, and the socket is left one reference short.
> When the last legitimate owner drops its reference the reqsk is freed
> while still reachable, leading to use-after-free panics in e.g.
> inet_csk_accept() or inet_csk_listen_stop().
>
> This reproduces in seconds with tcp_syncookies=0, a handful of threads
> doing connect()/close() to a local listener while others read an
> iter/tcp link in a tight loop.
>
> Use refcount_inc_not_zero() and skip the socket on failure, the same way
> every other ehash walker does. The listening hash is unaffected as
> listeners are always inserted into lhash2 with sk_refcnt >= 1, so
> bpf_iter_tcp_listening_batch() is left as-is.
>
> If every matching socket in a bucket is mid-init, end_sk can stay at 0;
> advance to the next bucket in that case rather than terminating the
> whole iteration on a stale batch[0].
>
> Fixes: 04c7820b776f ("bpf: tcp: Bpf iter batching and lock_sock")
> Reviewed-by: Ben Cressey <ben@cressey.dev>
> Assisted-by: Claude:unspecified
> Signed-off-by: Jose Fernandez (Anthropic) <jose.fernandez@linux.dev>
Reviewed-by: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>
> ---
> net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
> index fdc81150ff6c..92342dcc6892 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
> @@ -3074,25 +3074,25 @@ static unsigned int bpf_iter_tcp_established_batch(struct seq_file *seq,
> {
> struct bpf_tcp_iter_state *iter = seq->private;
> struct hlist_nulls_node *node;
> - unsigned int expected = 1;
> - struct sock *sk;
> + unsigned int expected = 0;
> + struct sock *sk = *start_sk;
>
> - sock_hold(*start_sk);
> - iter->batch[iter->end_sk++].sk = *start_sk;
> -
> - sk = sk_nulls_next(*start_sk);
> *start_sk = NULL;
> sk_nulls_for_each_from(sk, node) {
> - if (seq_sk_match(seq, sk)) {
> - if (iter->end_sk < iter->max_sk) {
> - sock_hold(sk);
> - iter->batch[iter->end_sk++].sk = sk;
> - } else if (!*start_sk) {
> - /* Remember where we left off. */
> - *start_sk = sk;
> - }
> - expected++;
> + if (!seq_sk_match(seq, sk))
> + continue;
> + if (iter->end_sk < iter->max_sk) {
> + /* reqsk_queue_hash_req() inserts with sk_refcnt == 0
> + * and refcount_set()s it after the bucket lock drops.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(!refcount_inc_not_zero(&sk->sk_refcnt)))
> + continue;
> + iter->batch[iter->end_sk++].sk = sk;
> + } else if (!*start_sk) {
> + /* Remember where we left off. */
> + *start_sk = sk;
> }
> + expected++;
> }
>
> return expected;
> @@ -3129,6 +3129,7 @@ static struct sock *bpf_iter_tcp_batch(struct seq_file *seq)
> struct sock *sk;
> int err;
>
> +again:
> sk = bpf_iter_tcp_resume(seq);
> if (!sk)
> return NULL; /* Done */
> @@ -3167,6 +3168,10 @@ static struct sock *bpf_iter_tcp_batch(struct seq_file *seq)
> WARN_ON_ONCE(iter->end_sk != expected);
> done:
> bpf_iter_tcp_unlock_bucket(seq);
> + if (unlikely(!iter->end_sk)) {
> + ++iter->state.bucket;
> + goto again;
> + }
> return iter->batch[0].sk;
> }
>
>
> ---
> base-commit: 4549871118cf616eecdd2d939f78e3b9e1dddc48
> change-id: 20260619-bpf-iter-tcp-refcnt-107d52b238da
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Jose Fernandez (Anthropic) <jose.fernandez@linux.dev>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-29 7:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-20 0:32 [PATCH bpf] bpf: tcp: Fix use-after-free in bpf_iter_tcp_established_batch() Jose Fernandez (Anthropic)
2026-06-20 14:06 ` Jiayuan Chen
2026-06-29 7:37 ` Emil Tsalapatis [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DJLD0ZG9V0D8.HLAXEIVG8HSP@etsalapatis.com \
--to=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ben@cressey.dev \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jose.fernandez@linux.dev \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox