Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] bpf, sockmap: handle spurious tcp_msg_wait_data() wakeup

["Emil Tsalapatis" <emil@etsalapatis.com>]

On Mon Jul 20, 2026 at 1:15 PM EDT, Nnamdi Onyeyiri wrote:
> recvfrom()/recv() are documented as only returning EAGAIN for blocking sockets
> when they have a receive timeout configured.  However, adding a blocking
> ipv4 tcp socket without a receive timeout to a sockmap will cause EAGAIN errors
> sporadically.  A socket with a receive timeout may return EAGAIN before the
> timeout expires.
>
> There are 2 code paths affected by this:
>
>   1. tcp_bpf_recvmsg() - Used when the socket has been added to a sockmap
>      that has no verdict program attached.
>
>   2. tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser() - Used when the socket has been added to a
>      sockmap that has a verdict program.  To reproduce this issue, it is
>      enough for the verdict program to do nothing but return SK_PASS.
>
> In both cases this happens when tcp_msg_wait_data() wakes spuriously
> (returning 0).  To fix it, we now loop back to msg_bytes_ready instead
> of returning -EAGAIN on spurious wakeup.
>
> To ensure the looping does not cause sockets with a SO_RCVTIMEO set to
> wait excessively long, tcp_msg_wait_data() now takes a pointer to timeo,
> allowing sk_wait_event() to update it as appropriate.
>
> The logic in tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser() that allow it to handle signals,
> socket errors and closuers in its loop was also added to tcp_bpf_recvmsg().
>
> Signed-off-by: Nnamdi Onyeyiri <nnamdio@gmail.com>
> ---
>  net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
> index cc0bd73f36b6..aa5c5d741599 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
> @@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tcp_bpf_sendmsg_redir);
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
>  static int tcp_msg_wait_data(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock,
> -			     long timeo)
> +			     long *timeo)
>  {
>  	DEFINE_WAIT_FUNC(wait, woken_wake_function);
>  	int ret = 0;
> @@ -187,12 +187,12 @@ static int tcp_msg_wait_data(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock,
>  	if (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN)
>  		return 1;
>  
> -	if (!timeo)
> +	if (!*timeo)
>  		return ret;
>  
>  	add_wait_queue(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);
>  	sk_set_bit(SOCKWQ_ASYNC_WAITDATA, sk);
> -	ret = sk_wait_event(sk, &timeo,
> +	ret = sk_wait_event(sk, timeo,
>  			    !list_empty(&psock->ingress_msg) ||
>  			    !skb_queue_empty_lockless(&sk->sk_receive_queue), &wait);
>  	sk_clear_bit(SOCKWQ_ASYNC_WAITDATA, sk);
> @@ -229,6 +229,7 @@ static int tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser(struct sock *sk,
>  	int copied_from_self = 0;
>  	int copied = 0;
>  	u32 seq;
> +	long timeo;
>  
>  	if (unlikely(flags & MSG_ERRQUEUE))
>  		return inet_recv_error(sk, msg, len);
> @@ -262,6 +263,8 @@ static int tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser(struct sock *sk,
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> +	timeo = sock_rcvtimeo(sk, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT);
> +
>  msg_bytes_ready:
>  	copied = __sk_msg_recvmsg(sk, psock, msg, len, flags, &copied_from_self);
>  	/* The typical case for EFAULT is the socket was gracefully
> @@ -280,7 +283,6 @@ static int tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser(struct sock *sk,
>  	}
>  	seq += copied_from_self;
>  	if (!copied) {
> -		long timeo;
>  		int data;
>  
>  		if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DONE))
> @@ -299,7 +301,6 @@ static int tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser(struct sock *sk,
>  			goto out;
>  		}
>  
> -		timeo = sock_rcvtimeo(sk, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT);
>  		if (!timeo) {
>  			copied = -EAGAIN;
>  			goto out;
> @@ -310,13 +311,15 @@ static int tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser(struct sock *sk,
>  			goto out;
>  		}
>  
> -		data = tcp_msg_wait_data(sk, psock, timeo);
> +		data = tcp_msg_wait_data(sk, psock, &timeo);
>  		if (data < 0) {
>  			copied = data;
>  			goto unlock;
>  		}
>  		if (data && !sk_psock_queue_empty(psock))
>  			goto msg_bytes_ready;
> +		if (!data && timeo > 0)
> +			goto msg_bytes_ready;
>  		copied = -EAGAIN;
>  	}
>  out:
> @@ -355,6 +358,7 @@ static int tcp_bpf_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
>  {
>  	struct sk_psock *psock;
>  	int copied, ret;
> +	long timeo;
>  
>  	if (unlikely(flags & MSG_ERRQUEUE))
>  		return inet_recv_error(sk, msg, len);
> @@ -371,14 +375,59 @@ static int tcp_bpf_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
>  		return tcp_recvmsg(sk, msg, len, flags);
>  	}
>  	lock_sock(sk);
> +
> +	timeo = sock_rcvtimeo(sk, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT);
> +
>  msg_bytes_ready:
>  	copied = sk_msg_recvmsg(sk, psock, msg, len, flags);
>  	if (!copied) {
> -		long timeo;
>  		int data;
>  
> -		timeo = sock_rcvtimeo(sk, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT);
> -		data = tcp_msg_wait_data(sk, psock, timeo);
> +		if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DONE)) {
> +			ret = 0;
> +			goto unlock;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (sk->sk_err) {
> +			if (!sk_psock_queue_empty(psock))
> +				goto msg_bytes_ready;
> +			if (!skb_queue_empty(&sk->sk_receive_queue)) {
> +				release_sock(sk);
> +				sk_psock_put(sk, psock);
> +				return tcp_recvmsg(sk, msg, len, flags);
> +			}
> +			ret = sock_error(sk);
> +			goto unlock;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN) {
> +			if (!sk_psock_queue_empty(psock))
> +				goto msg_bytes_ready;
> +			if (!skb_queue_empty(&sk->sk_receive_queue)) {
> +				release_sock(sk);
> +				sk_psock_put(sk, psock);
> +				return tcp_recvmsg(sk, msg, len, flags);
> +			}
> +			ret = 0;
> +			goto unlock;

These two error handling routines above look identical. Can you refactor
them?

> +		}
> +
> +		if (sk->sk_state == TCP_CLOSE) {
> +			ret = -ENOTCONN;
> +			goto unlock;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (!timeo) {
> +			ret = -EAGAIN;
> +			goto unlock;
> +		}
> +

Since this handling (which Sashiko flags by the way, correctly AFAICT) 
are taken from tcp_bpf_recvmsg, there is obvious overlap between the two
functions. Please factor those out so that they share the logic between
them.

pw-bot: cr

> +		if (signal_pending(current)) {
> +			ret = sock_intr_errno(timeo);
> +			goto unlock;
> +		}
> +
> +		data = tcp_msg_wait_data(sk, psock, &timeo);
>  		if (data < 0) {
>  			ret = data;
>  			goto unlock;
> @@ -390,6 +439,8 @@ static int tcp_bpf_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
>  			sk_psock_put(sk, psock);
>  			return tcp_recvmsg(sk, msg, len, flags);
>  		}
> +		if (!data && timeo > 0)
> +			goto msg_bytes_ready;
>  		copied = -EAGAIN;
>  	}
>  	ret = copied;