From: "Michael Walle" <mwalle@kernel.org>
To: "Manikandan Muralidharan" <manikandan.m@microchip.com>,
<pratyush@kernel.org>, <mwalle@kernel.org>,
<takahiro.kuwano@infineon.com>, <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
<richard@nod.at>, <vigneshr@ti.com>, <robh@kernel.org>,
<krzk+dt@kernel.org>, <conor+dt@kernel.org>, <srini@kernel.org>,
<nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>, <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
<claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>, <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
<richardcochran@gmail.com>, <linusw@kernel.org>, <arnd@arndb.de>,
<linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/7] mtd: spi-nor: sfdp: expose the SFDP as a read-only NVMEM device
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2026 09:02:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DK42262TYFG1.NZKF4VGZGSRM@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260721052859.171341-4-manikandan.m@microchip.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5545 bytes --]
On Tue Jul 21, 2026 at 7:28 AM CEST, Manikandan Muralidharan wrote:
> The SPI NOR core already reads the SFDP tables during enumeration and
> caches them in nor->sfdp->dwords (see spi_nor_parse_sfdp()). Re-expose
> that cached data as a read-only NVMEM device, in on-flash byte order,
> rooted at the flash's SFDP child node (compatible "jedec,sfdp").
>
> This lets NVMEM cells reference any SFDP data: a fixed-layout for
> parameters at a known offset, or an nvmem-layout parser for vendor data
> whose location must be discovered at runtime.The device is only registered
> when an "sfdp" node is present in the device tree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Manikandan Muralidharan <manikandan.m@microchip.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c | 8 ++++
> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.h | 1 +
> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/sfdp.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 95 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> index ccf4396cdcd0..b833d8ec2d65 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> @@ -3204,6 +3204,14 @@ static int spi_nor_init_params(struct spi_nor *nor)
> spi_nor_init_params_deprecated(nor);
> }
>
> + /*
> + * Expose the SFDP table as an NVMEM device only when
> + * the flash actually provides one
> + */
> + ret = spi_nor_register_sfdp_nvmem(nor);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> ret = spi_nor_late_init_params(nor);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.h b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.h
> index ba2d1a862c9d..0a6484298c5c 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.h
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.h
> @@ -698,6 +698,7 @@ int spi_nor_controller_ops_write_reg(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 opcode,
>
> int spi_nor_check_sfdp_signature(struct spi_nor *nor);
> int spi_nor_parse_sfdp(struct spi_nor *nor);
> +int spi_nor_register_sfdp_nvmem(struct spi_nor *nor);
That's probably not needed if..
> static inline struct spi_nor *mtd_to_spi_nor(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> {
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/sfdp.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/sfdp.c
> index 4600983cb579..704799fe92ae 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/sfdp.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/sfdp.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,8 @@
>
> #include <linux/bitfield.h>
> #include <linux/mtd/spi-nor.h>
> +#include <linux/nvmem-provider.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/sort.h>
>
> @@ -1612,3 +1614,87 @@ int spi_nor_parse_sfdp(struct spi_nor *nor)
> kfree(param_headers);
> return err;
> }
> +
> +static int spi_nor_sfdp_reg_read(void *priv, unsigned int offset,
> + void *val, size_t bytes)
> +{
> + struct spi_nor *nor = priv;
> + struct sfdp *sfdp = nor->sfdp;
> + size_t sfdp_size = sfdp->num_dwords * sizeof(*sfdp->dwords);
> +
> + if (offset >= sfdp_size || bytes > sfdp_size - offset)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /* The cached SFDP is kept in on-flash (little-endian) byte order. */
> + memcpy(val, (u8 *)sfdp->dwords + offset, bytes);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void spi_nor_sfdp_nvmem_put_np(void *data)
> +{
> + of_node_put(data);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * spi_nor_register_sfdp_nvmem() - expose the SFDP as a read-only NVMEM device
> + * @nor: pointer to a 'struct spi_nor'
> + *
> + * Expose the whole SFDP, in on-flash byte order, as a read-only NVMEM device
> + * rooted at the flash's SFDP child node (compatible "jedec,sfdp"). This lets
> + * generic (fixed-layout) or vendor (nvmem-layout) cells reference any SFDP
> + * data. The device is only registered when a child node with the "jedec,sfdp"
> + * compatible is described in the device tree.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success or if there is nothing to do, -errno otherwise.
> + */
> +int spi_nor_register_sfdp_nvmem(struct spi_nor *nor)
.. you move all this into the core, as the sfdp.c is just for
parsing the tables.
> +{
> + struct device *dev = nor->dev;
> + struct nvmem_config config = { };
> + struct nvmem_device *nvmem;
> + struct device_node *np;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!nor->sfdp)
> + return 0;
> +
> + for_each_available_child_of_node(dev_of_node(dev), np)
> + if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "jedec,sfdp"))
> + break;
There is already of_get_compatible_child() doing exactly this.
> + if (!np)
> + return 0;
> +
> + /*
> + * Register the put before devm_nvmem_register() so it runs last on
> + * detach, after the NVMEM device that uses the node is gone.
> + */
> + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, spi_nor_sfdp_nvmem_put_np, np);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + config.dev = dev;
> + config.of_node = np;
> + config.name = "sfdp";
> + config.id = NVMEM_DEVID_AUTO;
Or rather NVEMEM_DEVID_NONE? There will ever be just one SFDP nvmem
device.
How does the sysfs path looks like?
-michael
> + config.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> + config.read_only = true;
> + config.word_size = 1;
> + config.stride = 1;
> + config.size = (int)(nor->sfdp->num_dwords * sizeof(*nor->sfdp->dwords));
> + config.reg_read = spi_nor_sfdp_reg_read;
> + config.priv = nor;
> +
> + nvmem = devm_nvmem_register(dev, &config);
> + if (IS_ERR(nvmem)) {
> + /* NVMEM support is optional. */
> + if (PTR_ERR(nvmem) == -EOPNOTSUPP)
> + return 0;
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(nvmem),
> + "failed to register SFDP NVMEM device\n");
> + }
> +
> + dev_dbg(dev, "exposed %d-byte SFDP as an NVMEM device\n", config.size);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 297 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-21 7:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-21 5:28 [PATCH v5 0/7] Read MAC address from SST vendor specific SFDP region Manikandan Muralidharan
2026-07-21 5:28 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] dt-bindings: mtd: jedec,spi-nor: allow the SFDP to be exposed via NVMEM Manikandan Muralidharan
2026-07-21 5:28 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] dt-bindings: nvmem: layouts: add Microchip/SST SFDP EUI layout Manikandan Muralidharan
2026-07-21 7:45 ` Linus Walleij
2026-07-21 5:28 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] mtd: spi-nor: sfdp: expose the SFDP as a read-only NVMEM device Manikandan Muralidharan
2026-07-21 7:02 ` Michael Walle [this message]
2026-07-21 10:17 ` Manikandan.M
2026-07-21 11:12 ` Michael Walle
2026-07-21 5:28 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] nvmem: layouts: add Microchip/SST SFDP EUI layout driver Manikandan Muralidharan
2026-07-21 5:28 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] ARM: dts: microchip: sama5d27_wlsom1: use fixed-partitions for QSPI flash Manikandan Muralidharan
2026-07-21 5:28 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] ARM: dts: microchip: sama5d27_wlsom1: read MAC address from QSPI SFDP Manikandan Muralidharan
2026-07-21 7:49 ` Linus Walleij
2026-07-21 5:28 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] ARM: configs: sama5: enable Microchip/SST SFDP EUI NVMEM layout Manikandan Muralidharan
2026-07-21 7:49 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DK42262TYFG1.NZKF4VGZGSRM@kernel.org \
--to=mwalle@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=manikandan.m@microchip.com \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=srini@kernel.org \
--cc=takahiro.kuwano@infineon.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox