From: "Emil Tsalapatis" <emil@etsalapatis.com>
To: "Junseo Lim" <zirajs7@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: "Simon Horman" <horms@kernel.org>,
"Ido Schimmel" <idosch@nvidia.com>,
"Martin KaFai Lau" <martin.lau@kernel.org>,
"Leon Hwang" <leon.hwang@linux.dev>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
"Guillaume Nault" <gnault@redhat.com>,
"Fernando Fernandez Mancera" <fmancera@suse.de>,
<bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "Thomas Graf" <tgraf@suug.ch>,
"Sechang Lim" <rhkrqnwk98@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] lwt_bpf: account for aligned neigh header length
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 01:02:51 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DK9XW469QE7Q.18L1HIO9BRHC@etsalapatis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260727103005.897983-1-zirajs7@gmail.com>
On Mon Jul 27, 2026 at 6:30 AM EDT, Junseo Lim wrote:
> ip_finish_output2() expands an skb to LL_RESERVED_SPACE(dev) before LWT
> xmit. An LWT_XMIT BPF program can then modify the skb head and still
> return BPF_OK, so bpf_xmit() rechecks the remaining headroom before the
> skb continues to neighbour output.
>
> That recheck uses dst->dev->hard_header_len. This is not enough for the
> neighbour cached-header path: neigh_hh_output() copies the cached hardware
> header using the aligned hh_cache size, HH_DATA_MOD for short headers or
> HH_DATA_ALIGN(hh_len) otherwise.
>
> On Ethernet, hard_header_len is 14 but the cached copy needs 16 bytes. If
> an LWT_XMIT BPF program calls bpf_skb_change_head(skb, 1, 0), the skb can
> still have 15 bytes of headroom after the program. xmit_check_hhlen()
> accepts that, after which neigh_hh_output() hits its headroom warning and
> drops the skb.
>
> Compare against the aligned hardware header length in xmit_check_hhlen()
> so the BPF_OK path leaves enough headroom for neigh_hh_output()'s cached
> header copy.
>
> Fixes: 3a0af8fd61f9 ("bpf: BPF for lightweight tunnel infrastructure")
> Signed-off-by: Junseo Lim <zirajs7@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>
> ---
> Tested on a veth pair with an LWT_XMIT program calling
> bpf_skb_change_head(skb, 1, 0). Before the patch, a UDP packet sent by
> the reproducer triggers the neigh_hh_output() warning and is dropped.
> With the patch, the packet is delivered without the warning.
>
> Below is an excerpt of the warning before the patch:
>
> WARNING: ./include/net/neighbour.h:538 at ip_finish_output2+0x19f0/0x1f80, CPU#0: lwt_xmit_headro/55
> Call Trace:
> __ip_finish_output+0x59b/0x8b0
> ip_finish_output+0x67/0x390
> ip_output+0x1db/0x700
> ip_send_skb+0x1f6/0x270
> udp_send_skb+0x8d2/0xe00
> udp_sendmsg+0x1717/0x2620
> __sys_sendto+0x443/0x4e0
>
> net/core/lwt_bpf.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/lwt_bpf.c b/net/core/lwt_bpf.c
> index bf588f508b79..2890aa59a3a0 100644
> --- a/net/core/lwt_bpf.c
> +++ b/net/core/lwt_bpf.c
> @@ -169,8 +169,10 @@ static int bpf_output(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
>
> static int xmit_check_hhlen(struct sk_buff *skb, int hh_len)
> {
> - if (skb_headroom(skb) < hh_len) {
> - int nhead = HH_DATA_ALIGN(hh_len - skb_headroom(skb));
> + int hh_alen = HH_DATA_ALIGN(hh_len);
> +
> + if (skb_headroom(skb) < hh_alen) {
> + int nhead = HH_DATA_ALIGN(hh_alen - skb_headroom(skb));
>
> if (pskb_expand_head(skb, nhead, 0, GFP_ATOMIC))
> return -ENOMEM;
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-28 5:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-27 10:30 [PATCH bpf] lwt_bpf: account for aligned neigh header length Junseo Lim
2026-07-28 5:02 ` Emil Tsalapatis [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DK9XW469QE7Q.18L1HIO9BRHC@etsalapatis.com \
--to=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fmancera@suse.de \
--cc=gnault@redhat.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rhkrqnwk98@gmail.com \
--cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
--cc=zirajs7@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox