From: "Daniel Zahka" <daniel.zahka@gmail.com>
To: "Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>, <daniel.zahka@gmail.com>,
<willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: <edumazet@google.com>, <cratiu@nvidia.com>, <borisp@nvidia.com>,
<kuniyu@google.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 1/6] psp: steer Rx queues with the virtualization cookie
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2026 11:31:03 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DKWFJ9D12OPD.2ZLQHDM0276G4@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260822225524.2328465-2-kuba@kernel.org>
On Sat Aug 22, 2026 at 6:55 PM EDT, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> @@ -72,6 +90,27 @@ name: psp
> Present when in associated namespace, absent when in primary/host
> namespace.
> type: flag
> + -
> + name: vc-steer-cap
> + doc: |
> + Device can steer received traffic on the PSP virtualization
> + cookie (VC). The VC is split into a 32b reserved part, a 16b
> + queue ID the sender is asking the peer to send to, and a 16b
> + queue ID granting the peer's own request. Steering installs low
> + priority rules matching the latter, which win over the RSS table
> + result. Only needed for the rx direction; granting a peer's
> + request is just header generation and needs no device support.
> + type: flag
> + -
> + name: vc-steer-ena
> + doc: |
> + Directions taking part in VC based queue steering. Leave the
> + attribute out of a dev-set request to keep the current setting.
> + Applies to associations created from then on, existing ones keep
> + the setting they were created with.
> + type: u32
> + enum: vc-steer
> + enum-as-flags: true
>
Should vc-steer-ena be a connection level setting? Maybe it could go
into rx-assoc. The way it's implemented here, the state is already per
assoc.
> +Every driver has to carry the cookie, not just those which advertise
> +``vc-steer-cap`` - granting a peer's request needs no help from the
> +device, so the ``tx`` direction of ``vc-steer-ena`` may be turned on
> +anywhere. Drivers must ask ``psp_assoc_vc_tx_get()`` for the cookie to
> +place in the Tx header, and report the queue IDs a received cookie held
> +in ``psp_skb_ext.vc_req`` and ``vc_dst`` (``psp_dev_rcv()`` does this for
> +drivers which let the core strip the headers). Reporting is what allows
> +the core to grant the peer's request. The steering itself is only
> +expected of drivers which advertise ``vc-steer-cap``.
> +
> +When VC steering is enabled GRO implementations are allowed to ignore
> +changes in the cookie for transport mode PSP.
> +
Makes sense. Do we would need to update __psp_skb_coalesce_diff() here
then for the sw gro?
> struct psp_assoc {
> struct psp_dev *psd;
>
> @@ -159,6 +233,23 @@ struct psp_assoc {
> u8 generation;
> u8 version;
> u8 peer_tx;
> + /* enum psp_assoc_flags. Written under psd->lock, additionally read
> + * on the Tx fast path without it. A snapshot of the device config
> + * taken when the association was created, so that the header size,
> + * and with it the MSS, cannot change under an established
> + * connection.
> + */
> + u8 flags;
> +
> + /* Queue IDs for the VC, ours and the peer's. @vc_loc is refreshed
> + * from the Tx queue selection and goes out as the cookie's request,
> + * @vc_rem is learned from the peer's requests and goes back out as
> + * the destination. Both are PSP_VC_QID_NONE until something is
> + * learned. Written without the socket lock, always use
> + * READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE().
> + */
> + u16 vc_loc;
> + u16 vc_rem;
>
Unrelated, but this reminds me: some of the other fields here:
generation, spi, peer_tx, have some reads/writes that probably require
READ/WRITE_ONCE() and maybe deserve a similar comment here... Probably
all bugs that I introduced :/
> /* Encapsulate a TCP packet with PSP by adding the UDP+PSP headers and filling
> - * them in.
> + * them in. @vc is the virtualization cookie to place in the header, 0 for
> + * a header with no optional fields.
> */
> bool psp_dev_encapsulate(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb, __be32 spi,
> - u8 ver, __be16 sport)
> + u8 ver, __be16 sport, u64 vc)
> {
> u32 network_len = skb_network_header_len(skb);
> u32 ethr_len = skb_mac_header_len(skb);
> u32 bufflen = ethr_len + network_len;
> + u32 encap_len = PSP_ENCAP_HLEN;
>
> if (skb->protocol != htons(ETH_P_IP) &&
> skb->protocol != htons(ETH_P_IPV6))
> return false;
>
> - if (skb_cow_head(skb, PSP_ENCAP_HLEN))
> + if (vc)
> + encap_len += PSP_VC_SIZE;
> +
I suppose vc of 0 is probably valid. We might need something else to
disambiguate "not present".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-23 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-22 22:55 [RFC net-next 0/6] psp: use virt cookie as Rx steering hint Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-22 22:55 ` [RFC net-next 1/6] psp: steer Rx queues with the virtualization cookie Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-23 15:31 ` Daniel Zahka [this message]
2026-08-24 15:01 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-24 15:09 ` Cosmin Ratiu
2026-08-24 15:19 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-23 18:18 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-08-22 22:55 ` [RFC net-next 2/6] netdevsim: support PSP VC based queue steering Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-22 22:55 ` [RFC net-next 3/6] selftests: drv-net: psp: move the PSP test plumbing into psp_lib.py Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-22 22:55 ` [RFC net-next 4/6] selftests: drv-net: psp_steer: test PSP VC based queue steering Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-22 22:55 ` [RFC net-next 5/6] selftests: drv-net: psp_steer: test where PSP steering sits in the Rx pipeline Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-22 22:55 ` [RFC net-next 6/6] selftests: drv-net: psp_steer: cover corner cases and races Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-23 17:48 ` [RFC net-next 0/6] psp: use virt cookie as Rx steering hint Willem de Bruijn
2026-08-24 15:05 ` Cosmin Ratiu
2026-08-25 9:52 ` Cosmin Ratiu
2026-08-25 18:55 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-24 15:11 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-24 18:04 ` Willem de Bruijn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DKWFJ9D12OPD.2ZLQHDM0276G4@gmail.com \
--to=daniel.zahka@gmail.com \
--cc=borisp@nvidia.com \
--cc=cratiu@nvidia.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox