From: "Daniel Zahka" <daniel.zahka@gmail.com>
To: <netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org>, <daniel.zahka@gmail.com>
Cc: <alexanderduyck@fb.com>, <kuba@kernel.org>,
<kernel-team@meta.com>, <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
<davem@davemloft.net>, <edumazet@kernel.org>, <pabeni@redhat.com>,
<dimitri.daskalakis1@gmail.com>, <mohsin.bashr@gmail.com>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 4/6] eth: mpnic: UDP segmentation offload
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2026 06:03:50 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DMT6KSM217ED.NPICK8VGAPQ0@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179447813712.2199510.12165491734923049464@kernel.org>
On Thu Nov 12, 2026 at 5:08 AM EST, netdev-bot+sashiko wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
> issue(s) to consider.
>
> Critical: 0 · High: 0 · Medium: 1 · Low: 0
>
> If you believe none of the issues are legitimate, please reply to each
> issue of Medium severity or higher and explain why the AI is wrong.
> If any of them are legitimate and you plan to respin, please let patchwork
> know by including "pw-bot: cr" as a separate line at the end of your reply
> (one such reply per series is enough).
>
> - [Medium] This patch adds `skb->len < MPNIC_MIN_FRAME_LEN ||` to the
> generic `skb_is_gso(skb)` branch of mpnic_features_check()…
>
> --
>
> eth: mpnic: UDP segmentation offload
>
> This commit adds NETIF_F_GSO_UDP_L4 support for non-encapsulated udp4
> and udp6 packets. As for TCP, the UDP checksum is seeded with a zero
> length. It also makes mpnic_features_check() fall back to software GSO
> for skbs shorter than MPNIC_MIN_FRAME_LEN.
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/meta/mpnic/mpnic_txrx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/meta/mpnic/mpnic_txrx.c
>> index b78f8599bbe8f..2a0560b7dd19e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/meta/mpnic/mpnic_txrx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/meta/mpnic/mpnic_txrx.c
>
> [ ... ]
>
>> @@ -369,7 +384,8 @@ netdev_features_t mpnic_features_check(struct sk_buff *skb,
>> return features & ~(NETIF_F_CSUM_MASK | NETIF_F_GSO_MASK);
>>
>> if (skb_is_gso(skb) &&
>> - !FIELD_FIT(MPNIC_TWD_MSS, skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_size))
>> + (skb->len < MPNIC_MIN_FRAME_LEN ||
>> + !FIELD_FIT(MPNIC_TWD_MSS, skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_size)))
>> return features & ~NETIF_F_GSO_MASK;
>
> [Severity: Medium]
> This check applies to every GSO type. That means TCP GSO skbs shorter
> than 60 bytes now fall back to software GSO too, not just UDP ones.
>
> The commit message body only talks about UDP. The only mention of this
> check is the v2 changelog below the "---", and that text is dropped when
> the patch is applied:
>
> v2:
> - fall back to SW GSO for skbs shorter than MPNIC_MIN_FRAME_LEN, since
> HW LSO would segment the zero padding as payload
>
> Should the commit message describe the effect on TCP? Or should the
> check move into the earlier "eth: mpnic: TCP segmentation offload"
> patch?
>
> With only the TSO patch applied, TCP seems to have the same problem. In
> that version, mpnic_features_check() rejected GSO only when gso_size
> didn't fit MPNIC_TWD_MSS. So a short TCP GSO skb reaches
> mpnic_xmit_frame_ring() with HW TSO enabled, and gets padded first:
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/meta/mpnic/mpnic_txrx.c:mpnic_xmit_frame_ring() {
> ...
> if (skb_put_padto(skb, MPNIC_MIN_FRAME_LEN))
> goto err_drop;
> ...
> }
>
> Then mpnic_tx_lso() seeds the TCP pseudo-checksum from the padded
> length:
>
> payload_len = cpu_to_be16(skb->len - skb_checksum_start_offset(skb));
> csum_replace_by_diff(&tcph->check, (__force __wsum)payload_len);
>
> Locally generated TCP GSO skbs are always longer than 60 bytes. A GSO
> skb built from a virtio_net_hdr can be shorter, though. Sources include
> tun/vhost and packet sockets with a vnet header. Such an skb can carry
> a tiny gso_size and only a few bytes of payload.
>
Local sashiko review surfaced the same complaint and wanted me to pull
the check forward one commit. I decided against it. The UDP case is
easily reachable because the user chooses the gso size. I don't think
producing a TSO skb shorter than 60B is really possible. The
virtio_net_hdr cases should have a min GSO size of TCP_MIN_GSO_SIZE set
in virtio_net_hdr_to_skb().
> In that case, wouldn't the receiver get the zero padding as TCP stream
> data, with a valid checksum?
>
> The check is still present at the end of the series, so the final tree
> is fine. The TSO commit on its own would still corrupt data if someone
> bisects to it or backports it alone.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-12 11:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-10 22:06 [PATCH net-next v2 0/6] eth: mpnic: checksum and segmentation offloads Daniel Zahka
2026-11-10 22:06 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/6] eth: mpnic: Tx checksum offload Daniel Zahka
2026-11-12 10:08 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-10 22:06 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/6] eth: mpnic: Rx " Daniel Zahka
2026-11-10 22:06 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/6] eth: mpnic: TCP segmentation offload Daniel Zahka
2026-11-12 10:08 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-10 22:06 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/6] eth: mpnic: UDP " Daniel Zahka
2026-11-12 10:08 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-12 11:03 ` Daniel Zahka [this message]
2026-11-10 22:06 ` [PATCH net-next v2 5/6] eth: mpnic: IPv4 and IPv6 in IPv6 tunnel segmentation Daniel Zahka
2026-11-12 10:08 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-10 22:06 ` [PATCH net-next v2 6/6] eth: mpnic: add GSO_PARTIAL for other tunnels Daniel Zahka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DMT6KSM217ED.NPICK8VGAPQ0@gmail.com \
--to=daniel.zahka@gmail.com \
--cc=alexanderduyck@fb.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dimitri.daskalakis1@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mohsin.bashr@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox