From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yevgeny Petrilin Subject: RE: [PATCH 01/25 v2] mlx4_core: identify function as pf or vf Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:21:30 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4AF3930E.90904@mellanox.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Cc: "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Liran Liss , Tziporet Koren To: Roland Dreier Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org > I'm a bit confused by these flags. As far as I can tell, the SRIOV flag will be set if and > only if MASTER is set too... so in other words we might as well just have the MASTER and > > SLAVE flags and not have the SRIOV flag at all. We could have a situation where we have multiple physical functions, without SRIOV. In this case one of the functions would be MASTER, but not SRIOV Yevgeny -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html