* [patch 10/18] net/g96100eth: replace gt96100_delay() with msleep_interruptible()
@ 2004-10-30 22:42 janitor
2004-10-31 11:06 ` Jeff Garzik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: janitor @ 2004-10-30 22:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jgarzik; +Cc: netdev, janitor, nacc
Any comments would be appreciated.
Description: Use msleep_interruptible() instead of gt96100_delay() so
that the task delays as expected. Remove the prototype and definition of
gt96100_delay(). As I currently understand it, the check for interrupt
context is not necessary in gt96100_delay(), as such a sleep will be
caught within the scheduler.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Attems <janitor@sternwelten.at>
---
linux-2.6.10-rc1-max/drivers/net/gt96100eth.c | 19 ++++---------------
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff -puN drivers/net/gt96100eth.c~msleep_interruptible-drivers_net_gt96100eth drivers/net/gt96100eth.c
--- linux-2.6.10-rc1/drivers/net/gt96100eth.c~msleep_interruptible-drivers_net_gt96100eth 2004-10-24 17:05:12.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.10-rc1-max/drivers/net/gt96100eth.c 2004-10-24 17:05:12.000000000 +0200
@@ -59,7 +59,6 @@
// prototypes
static void* dmaalloc(size_t size, dma_addr_t *dma_handle);
static void dmafree(size_t size, void *vaddr);
-static void gt96100_delay(int msec);
static int gt96100_add_hash_entry(struct net_device *dev,
unsigned char* addr);
static void read_mib_counters(struct gt96100_private *gp);
@@ -183,16 +182,6 @@ static void dmafree(size_t size, void *v
free_pages((unsigned long)vaddr, get_order(size));
}
-static void gt96100_delay(int ms)
-{
- if (in_interrupt())
- return;
- else {
- current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
- schedule_timeout(ms*HZ/1000);
- }
-}
-
static int
parse_mac_addr(struct net_device *dev, char* macstr)
{
@@ -238,7 +227,7 @@ read_MII(int phy_addr, u32 reg)
// wait for last operation to complete
while (GT96100_READ(GT96100_ETH_SMI_REG) & smirBusy) {
// snooze for 1 msec and check again
- gt96100_delay(1);
+ msleep_interruptible(1);
if (--timedout == 0) {
printk(KERN_ERR "%s: busy timeout!!\n", __FUNCTION__);
@@ -252,7 +241,7 @@ read_MII(int phy_addr, u32 reg)
// wait for read to complete
while (!((smir = GT96100_READ(GT96100_ETH_SMI_REG)) & smirReadValid)) {
// snooze for 1 msec and check again
- gt96100_delay(1);
+ msleep_interruptible(1);
if (--timedout == 0) {
printk(KERN_ERR "%s: timeout!!\n", __FUNCTION__);
@@ -304,7 +293,7 @@ write_MII(int phy_addr, u32 reg, u16 dat
// wait for last operation to complete
while (GT96100_READ(GT96100_ETH_SMI_REG) & smirBusy) {
// snooze for 1 msec and check again
- gt96100_delay(1);
+ msleep_interruptible(1);
if (--timedout == 0) {
printk(KERN_ERR "%s: busy timeout!!\n", __FUNCTION__);
@@ -528,7 +517,7 @@ abort(struct net_device *dev, u32 abort_
// wait for abort to complete
while (GT96100ETH_READ(gp, GT96100_ETH_SDMA_COMM) & abort_bits) {
// snooze for 20 msec and check again
- gt96100_delay(1);
+ msleep_interruptible(20);
if (--timedout == 0) {
err("%s: timeout!!\n", __FUNCTION__);
_
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [patch 10/18] net/g96100eth: replace gt96100_delay() with msleep_interruptible()
2004-10-30 22:42 [patch 10/18] net/g96100eth: replace gt96100_delay() with msleep_interruptible() janitor
@ 2004-10-31 11:06 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-11-01 19:08 ` [PATCH] net/gt96100eth: " Nishanth Aravamudan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2004-10-31 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: janitor; +Cc: netdev, nacc
janitor@sternwelten.at wrote:
> @@ -528,7 +517,7 @@ abort(struct net_device *dev, u32 abort_
> // wait for abort to complete
> while (GT96100ETH_READ(gp, GT96100_ETH_SDMA_COMM) & abort_bits) {
> // snooze for 20 msec and check again
> - gt96100_delay(1);
> + msleep_interruptible(20);
>
> if (--timedout == 0) {
don't change the behavior of the driver, even if it disagrees with the
comment.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [PATCH] net/gt96100eth: replace gt96100_delay() with msleep_interruptible()
2004-10-31 11:06 ` Jeff Garzik
@ 2004-11-01 19:08 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2004-11-05 7:47 ` Jeff Garzik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Nishanth Aravamudan @ 2004-11-01 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Garzik; +Cc: netdev, kernel-janitors
On Sun, Oct 31, 2004 at 06:06:23AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> janitor@sternwelten.at wrote:
> >@@ -528,7 +517,7 @@ abort(struct net_device *dev, u32 abort_
> > // wait for abort to complete
> > while (GT96100ETH_READ(gp, GT96100_ETH_SDMA_COMM) & abort_bits) {
> > // snooze for 20 msec and check again
> >- gt96100_delay(1);
> >+ msleep_interruptible(20);
> >
> > if (--timedout == 0) {
>
>
> don't change the behavior of the driver, even if it disagrees with the
> comment.
Ok, please find the corrected patch below.
Description: Uses msleep_interruptible() instead of gt96100_delay()
to guarantee the task delays as expected. Removes prototype and
definition of now unused gt96100_delay() function. Corrects one comment
to correspond to the code.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
--- 2.6.10-rc1-vanilla/drivers/net/gt96100eth.c 2004-10-30 15:33:30.000000000 -0700
+++ 2.6.10-rc1/drivers/net/gt96100eth.c 2004-11-01 11:05:37.000000000 -0800
@@ -59,7 +59,6 @@
// prototypes
static void* dmaalloc(size_t size, dma_addr_t *dma_handle);
static void dmafree(size_t size, void *vaddr);
-static void gt96100_delay(int msec);
static int gt96100_add_hash_entry(struct net_device *dev,
unsigned char* addr);
static void read_mib_counters(struct gt96100_private *gp);
@@ -183,16 +182,6 @@ static void dmafree(size_t size, void *v
free_pages((unsigned long)vaddr, get_order(size));
}
-static void gt96100_delay(int ms)
-{
- if (in_interrupt())
- return;
- else {
- current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
- schedule_timeout(ms*HZ/1000);
- }
-}
-
static int
parse_mac_addr(struct net_device *dev, char* macstr)
{
@@ -238,7 +227,7 @@ read_MII(int phy_addr, u32 reg)
// wait for last operation to complete
while (GT96100_READ(GT96100_ETH_SMI_REG) & smirBusy) {
// snooze for 1 msec and check again
- gt96100_delay(1);
+ msleep_interruptible(1);
if (--timedout == 0) {
printk(KERN_ERR "%s: busy timeout!!\n", __FUNCTION__);
@@ -252,7 +241,7 @@ read_MII(int phy_addr, u32 reg)
// wait for read to complete
while (!((smir = GT96100_READ(GT96100_ETH_SMI_REG)) & smirReadValid)) {
// snooze for 1 msec and check again
- gt96100_delay(1);
+ msleep_interruptible(1);
if (--timedout == 0) {
printk(KERN_ERR "%s: timeout!!\n", __FUNCTION__);
@@ -304,7 +293,7 @@ write_MII(int phy_addr, u32 reg, u16 dat
// wait for last operation to complete
while (GT96100_READ(GT96100_ETH_SMI_REG) & smirBusy) {
// snooze for 1 msec and check again
- gt96100_delay(1);
+ msleep_interruptible(1);
if (--timedout == 0) {
printk(KERN_ERR "%s: busy timeout!!\n", __FUNCTION__);
@@ -527,8 +516,8 @@ abort(struct net_device *dev, u32 abort_
// wait for abort to complete
while (GT96100ETH_READ(gp, GT96100_ETH_SDMA_COMM) & abort_bits) {
- // snooze for 20 msec and check again
- gt96100_delay(1);
+ // snooze for 1 msec and check again
+ msleep_interruptible(1);
if (--timedout == 0) {
err("%s: timeout!!\n", __FUNCTION__);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] net/gt96100eth: replace gt96100_delay() with msleep_interruptible()
2004-11-01 19:08 ` [PATCH] net/gt96100eth: " Nishanth Aravamudan
@ 2004-11-05 7:47 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-11-05 17:46 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2004-11-05 7:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nishanth Aravamudan; +Cc: netdev, kernel-janitors
Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 31, 2004 at 06:06:23AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
>>janitor@sternwelten.at wrote:
>>
>>>@@ -528,7 +517,7 @@ abort(struct net_device *dev, u32 abort_
>>> // wait for abort to complete
>>> while (GT96100ETH_READ(gp, GT96100_ETH_SDMA_COMM) & abort_bits) {
>>> // snooze for 20 msec and check again
>>>- gt96100_delay(1);
>>>+ msleep_interruptible(20);
>>>
>>> if (--timedout == 0) {
>>
>>
>>don't change the behavior of the driver, even if it disagrees with the
>>comment.
>
>
> Ok, please find the corrected patch below.
>
> Description: Uses msleep_interruptible() instead of gt96100_delay()
> to guarantee the task delays as expected. Removes prototype and
> definition of now unused gt96100_delay() function. Corrects one comment
> to correspond to the code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
>
>
> --- 2.6.10-rc1-vanilla/drivers/net/gt96100eth.c 2004-10-30 15:33:30.000000000 -0700
> +++ 2.6.10-rc1/drivers/net/gt96100eth.c 2004-11-01 11:05:37.000000000 -0800
> @@ -59,7 +59,6 @@
> // prototypes
> static void* dmaalloc(size_t size, dma_addr_t *dma_handle);
> static void dmafree(size_t size, void *vaddr);
> -static void gt96100_delay(int msec);
> static int gt96100_add_hash_entry(struct net_device *dev,
> unsigned char* addr);
> static void read_mib_counters(struct gt96100_private *gp);
> @@ -183,16 +182,6 @@ static void dmafree(size_t size, void *v
> free_pages((unsigned long)vaddr, get_order(size));
> }
>
> -static void gt96100_delay(int ms)
> -{
> - if (in_interrupt())
> - return;
> - else {
> - current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
> - schedule_timeout(ms*HZ/1000);
I'm still worried about this patch, because
1) in_interrupt() check disappears, and
2) does driver already include linux/delay.h ?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] net/gt96100eth: replace gt96100_delay() with msleep_interruptible()
2004-11-05 7:47 ` Jeff Garzik
@ 2004-11-05 17:46 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Nishanth Aravamudan @ 2004-11-05 17:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Garzik; +Cc: netdev, kernel-janitors
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 02:47:02AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> >On Sun, Oct 31, 2004 at 06:06:23AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >
> >>janitor@sternwelten.at wrote:
> >>
> >>>@@ -528,7 +517,7 @@ abort(struct net_device *dev, u32 abort_
> >>> // wait for abort to complete
> >>> while (GT96100ETH_READ(gp, GT96100_ETH_SDMA_COMM) & abort_bits) {
> >>> // snooze for 20 msec and check again
> >>>- gt96100_delay(1);
> >>>+ msleep_interruptible(20);
> >>>
> >>> if (--timedout == 0) {
> >>
> >>
> >>don't change the behavior of the driver, even if it disagrees with the
> >>comment.
> >
> >
> >Ok, please find the corrected patch below.
> >
> >Description: Uses msleep_interruptible() instead of gt96100_delay()
> >to guarantee the task delays as expected. Removes prototype and
> >definition of now unused gt96100_delay() function. Corrects one comment
> >to correspond to the code.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
> >
> >
> >--- 2.6.10-rc1-vanilla/drivers/net/gt96100eth.c 2004-10-30
> >15:33:30.000000000 -0700
> >+++ 2.6.10-rc1/drivers/net/gt96100eth.c 2004-11-01
> >11:05:37.000000000 -0800
> >@@ -59,7 +59,6 @@
> > // prototypes
> > static void* dmaalloc(size_t size, dma_addr_t *dma_handle);
> > static void dmafree(size_t size, void *vaddr);
> >-static void gt96100_delay(int msec);
> > static int gt96100_add_hash_entry(struct net_device *dev,
> > unsigned char* addr);
> > static void read_mib_counters(struct gt96100_private *gp);
> >@@ -183,16 +182,6 @@ static void dmafree(size_t size, void *v
> > free_pages((unsigned long)vaddr, get_order(size));
> > }
> >
> >-static void gt96100_delay(int ms)
> >-{
> >- if (in_interrupt())
> >- return;
> >- else {
> >- current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
> >- schedule_timeout(ms*HZ/1000);
>
> I'm still worried about this patch, because
>
> 1) in_interrupt() check disappears, and
This is true... I have changed the patch significantly, leaving the
gt96100_delay() function intact and simply replacing the else result
with msleep_interruptible(). Does this newer patch look better to you?
Thanks for all the input!
> 2) does driver already include linux/delay.h ?
Yes, it does.
Description: Uses msleep_interruptible() instead of schedule_timeout()
in the gt96100_delay() function. Corrects one comment to correspond to
the code.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
--- 2.6.10-rc1-vanilla/drivers/net/gt96100eth.c 2004-11-05 09:42:37.000000000 -0800
+++ 2.6.10-rc1/drivers/net/gt96100eth.c 2004-11-05 09:45:48.000000000 -0800
@@ -187,10 +187,8 @@ static void gt96100_delay(int ms)
{
if (in_interrupt())
return;
- else {
- current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
- schedule_timeout(ms*HZ/1000);
- }
+ else
+ msleep_interruptible(ms);
}
static int
@@ -527,7 +525,7 @@ abort(struct net_device *dev, u32 abort_
// wait for abort to complete
while (GT96100ETH_READ(gp, GT96100_ETH_SDMA_COMM) & abort_bits) {
- // snooze for 20 msec and check again
+ // snooze for 1 msec and check again
gt96100_delay(1);
if (--timedout == 0) {
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-11-05 17:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-10-30 22:42 [patch 10/18] net/g96100eth: replace gt96100_delay() with msleep_interruptible() janitor
2004-10-31 11:06 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-11-01 19:08 ` [PATCH] net/gt96100eth: " Nishanth Aravamudan
2004-11-05 7:47 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-11-05 17:46 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).