From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bodo Eggert <7eggert@elstempel.de> Subject: Re: bonding: cannot remove certain named devices Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 02:02:03 +0200 Message-ID: References: <6Kd5j-3Y7-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <6KdRL-5xP-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <6Ke1p-5N8-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <6KekO-6u0-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <6KeXv-7qe-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <6KfTz-OX-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <6KfTA-OX-15@gated-at.bofh.it> Reply-To: 7eggert@gmx.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.188]:53999 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750703AbWHPAFt (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Aug 2006 20:05:49 -0400 To: Stephen Hemminger , Mitch Williams , Bill Nottingham , ?missing closing '"' in token?"Williams", Mitch A , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Stephen Hemminger wrote: > IMHO idiots who put space's in filenames should be ignored. As long a= s the > bonding code doesn't throw a fatal error, it has every right to retur= n > "No such device" to the fool. Maybe you should limit device names to eight uppercase characters and u= p to three characters extension, too. NOT! There is no reason to artificiall= y impose limitations on device names, so don't do that. --=20 Ich danke GMX daf=FCr, die Verwendung meiner Adressen mittels per SPF verbreiteten L=FCgen zu sabotieren. http://david.woodhou.se/why-not-spf.html