netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Kuzminsky <seb@highlab.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: bug in tcp?
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 16:28:22 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1HdZgM-0001n2-F0@highlab.com> (raw)

I'm seeing some weird behavior in TCP.  The issue is perfectly
reproducible using netcat and other programs.  This is what I do:

    1.  Open a TCP connection over the loopback (over IPv4).

    2.  Send a couple of bytes of data each way.  No problems.

    3.  Wait about 120 hours with no writes on either side of the
        connection.

    4.  write() a few bytes to the server's socket.  I'd expect the data
        to go through, but it doesnt.  I see the TCP frame from the
        server to the client, but instead of an ACK, the client sends
        back a RST.  netstat shows the bytes sitting in the server's
        socket's send-buffer.

    5.  write a few bytes to the client's socket.  The server gets
        these immediately.

    6.  On the next server-to-client retransmit, the client gets the
        bytes from the server.  After this, the connection works normally.


The libpcap capture file is here (only shows steps 4-6):

    http://highlab.com/~seb/tcp-idleness-bug


The behavior is reproducible on all kernels I've tried: 2.4.32, 2.6.19.1,
and 2.6.20.4.  I dont think it's iptables-related, though I'm rerunning
the tests on a machine without iptables to be sure.  I'll have results
for you in 120 hours.  ;-)


-- 
Sebastian Kuzminsky

             reply	other threads:[~2007-04-16 22:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-16 22:28 Sebastian Kuzminsky [this message]
2007-04-16 22:50 ` bug in tcp? Stephen Hemminger
2007-04-16 23:05   ` Sebastian Kuzminsky
2007-04-16 23:30     ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-04-17  4:19       ` Sebastian Kuzminsky
2007-04-17  4:30       ` John Heffner
2007-04-17  4:42         ` Sebastian Kuzminsky
2007-04-17  4:44 ` Philip Craig
2007-04-17  5:35   ` Sebastian Kuzminsky
2007-04-17  6:13     ` Philip Craig
2007-04-17 13:56       ` Sebastian Kuzminsky
2007-04-18  0:03         ` Philip Craig
2007-04-23 18:45         ` bug in my understanding (was Re: bug in tcp?) Sebastian Kuzminsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1HdZgM-0001n2-F0@highlab.com \
    --to=seb@highlab.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).