From: Sebastian Kuzminsky <seb@highlab.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: bug in tcp?
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 17:05:42 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1HdaGU-0001sZ-JS@highlab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070416155038.3bfa5104@freekitty>
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 16:28:22 -0600
> Sebastian Kuzminsky <seb@highlab.com> wrote:
>
> > I'm seeing some weird behavior in TCP. The issue is perfectly
> > reproducible using netcat and other programs. This is what I do:
> >
> > 1. Open a TCP connection over the loopback (over IPv4).
> >
> > 2. Send a couple of bytes of data each way. No problems.
> >
> > 3. Wait about 120 hours with no writes on either side of the
> > connection.
> >
> > 4. write() a few bytes to the server's socket. I'd expect the data
> > to go through, but it doesnt. I see the TCP frame from the
> > server to the client, but instead of an ACK, the client sends
> > back a RST. netstat shows the bytes sitting in the server's
> > socket's send-buffer.
> >
> > 5. write a few bytes to the client's socket. The server gets
> > these immediately.
> >
> > 6. On the next server-to-client retransmit, the client gets the
> > bytes from the server. After this, the connection works normally.
> >
> >
> > The libpcap capture file is here (only shows steps 4-6):
> >
> > http://highlab.com/~seb/tcp-idleness-bug
> >
> >
> > The behavior is reproducible on all kernels I've tried: 2.4.32, 2.6.19.1,
> > and 2.6.20.4. I dont think it's iptables-related, though I'm rerunning
> > the tests on a machine without iptables to be sure. I'll have results
> > for you in 120 hours. ;-)
> >
> >
>
> What server? Some servers do application timeouts.
I've observed the behavior with the server mode of nc, and with a homebrew
application which does not do app-level timeouts.
But anyway, application timeouts wouldnt explain the described behavior,
afaik.
--
Sebastian Kuzminsky
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-16 23:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-16 22:28 bug in tcp? Sebastian Kuzminsky
2007-04-16 22:50 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-04-16 23:05 ` Sebastian Kuzminsky [this message]
2007-04-16 23:30 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-04-17 4:19 ` Sebastian Kuzminsky
2007-04-17 4:30 ` John Heffner
2007-04-17 4:42 ` Sebastian Kuzminsky
2007-04-17 4:44 ` Philip Craig
2007-04-17 5:35 ` Sebastian Kuzminsky
2007-04-17 6:13 ` Philip Craig
2007-04-17 13:56 ` Sebastian Kuzminsky
2007-04-18 0:03 ` Philip Craig
2007-04-23 18:45 ` bug in my understanding (was Re: bug in tcp?) Sebastian Kuzminsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1HdaGU-0001sZ-JS@highlab.com \
--to=seb@highlab.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).