From: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next 08/17] net: sfp: control TX_DISABLE and phy only from main state machine
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2019 14:06:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1iTnrd-0005Ad-9B@rmk-PC.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191110140530.GA25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
We initialise TX_DISABLE when the sfp cage is probed, and then
maintain its state in the main state machine. However, the module
state machine:
- negates it when detecting a newly inserted module when it's already
guaranteed to be negated.
- negates it when the module is removed, but the main state machine
will do this anyway.
Make TX_DISABLE entirely controlled by the main state machine.
The main state machine also probes the module for a PHY, and removes
the PHY when the the module is removed. Hence, removing the PHY in
sfp_sm_module_remove() is also redundant, and is a left-over from
when we tried to probe for the PHY from the module state machine.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
---
drivers/net/phy/sfp.c | 9 +--------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c b/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
index 7accd24a6875..bd55584e193d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
@@ -1494,11 +1494,6 @@ static void sfp_sm_mod_remove(struct sfp *sfp)
sfp_hwmon_remove(sfp);
- if (sfp->mod_phy)
- sfp_sm_phy_detach(sfp);
-
- sfp_module_tx_disable(sfp);
-
memset(&sfp->id, 0, sizeof(sfp->id));
sfp->module_power_mW = 0;
@@ -1536,10 +1531,8 @@ static void sfp_sm_module(struct sfp *sfp, unsigned int event)
switch (sfp->sm_mod_state) {
default:
- if (event == SFP_E_INSERT && sfp->attached) {
- sfp_module_tx_disable(sfp);
+ if (event == SFP_E_INSERT && sfp->attached)
sfp_sm_mod_next(sfp, SFP_MOD_PROBE, T_SERIAL);
- }
break;
case SFP_MOD_PROBE:
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-10 14:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-10 14:05 [PATCH net-next 00/17] Allow slow to initialise GPON modules to work Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-11-10 14:06 ` [PATCH net-next 01/17] net: sfp: move sfp sub-state machines into separate functions Russell King
2019-11-10 17:56 ` Andrew Lunn
2019-11-10 14:06 ` [PATCH net-next 02/17] net: sfp: move tx disable on device down to main state machine Russell King
2019-11-10 18:00 ` Andrew Lunn
2019-11-10 14:06 ` [PATCH net-next 03/17] net: sfp: rename sfp_sm_ins_next() as sfp_sm_mod_next() Russell King
2019-11-10 18:01 ` Andrew Lunn
2019-11-10 14:06 ` [PATCH net-next 04/17] net: sfp: handle module remove outside state machine Russell King
2019-11-10 18:07 ` Andrew Lunn
2019-11-10 14:06 ` [PATCH net-next 05/17] net: sfp: rename T_PROBE_WAIT to T_SERIAL Russell King
2019-11-10 18:08 ` Andrew Lunn
2019-11-10 14:06 ` [PATCH net-next 06/17] net: sfp: parse SFP power requirement earlier Russell King
2019-11-10 18:10 ` Andrew Lunn
2019-11-10 14:06 ` [PATCH net-next 07/17] net: sfp: avoid power switch on address-change modules Russell King
2019-11-10 18:12 ` Andrew Lunn
2019-11-10 14:06 ` Russell King [this message]
2019-11-10 18:14 ` [PATCH net-next 08/17] net: sfp: control TX_DISABLE and phy only from main state machine Andrew Lunn
2019-11-10 14:06 ` [PATCH net-next 09/17] net: sfp: split the PHY probe from sfp_sm_mod_init() Russell King
2019-11-10 18:19 ` Andrew Lunn
2019-11-10 14:06 ` [PATCH net-next 10/17] net: sfp: eliminate mdelay() from PHY probe Russell King
2019-11-10 19:37 ` Andrew Lunn
2019-11-10 19:59 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-11-10 14:07 ` [PATCH net-next 11/17] net: sfp: allow fault processing to transition to other states Russell King
2019-11-10 14:07 ` [PATCH net-next 12/17] net: sfp: ensure TX_FAULT has deasserted before probing the PHY Russell King
2019-11-10 14:07 ` [PATCH net-next 13/17] net: sfp: track upstream's attachment state in state machine Russell King
2019-11-10 14:07 ` [PATCH net-next 14/17] net: sfp: split power mode switching from probe Russell King
2019-11-10 14:07 ` [PATCH net-next 15/17] net: sfp: move module insert reporting out of probe Russell King
2019-11-10 14:07 ` [PATCH net-next 16/17] net: sfp: allow sfp to probe slow to initialise GPON modules Russell King
2019-11-10 14:07 ` [PATCH net-next 17/17] net: sfp: allow modules with slow diagnostics to probe Russell King
2019-11-10 17:52 ` [PATCH net-next 00/17] Allow slow to initialise GPON modules to work Andrew Lunn
2019-11-10 19:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-11-12 0:18 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1iTnrd-0005Ad-9B@rmk-PC.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).