From: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net] net: phy: make phy_error() report which PHY has failed
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 12:53:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1ihCLZ-0001Vo-Nw@rmk-PC.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
phy_error() is called from phy_interrupt() or phy_state_machine(), and
uses WARN_ON() to print a backtrace. The backtrace is not useful when
reporting a PHY error.
However, a system may contain multiple ethernet PHYs, and phy_error()
gives no clue which one caused the problem.
Replace WARN_ON() with a call to phydev_err() so that we can see which
PHY had an error, and also inform the user that we are halting the PHY.
Fixes: fa7b28c11bbf ("net: phy: print stack trace in phy_error")
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
---
There is another related problem in this area. If an error is detected
while the PHY is running, phy_error() moves to PHY_HALTED state. If we
try to take the network device down, then:
void phy_stop(struct phy_device *phydev)
{
if (!phy_is_started(phydev)) {
WARN(1, "called from state %s\n",
phy_state_to_str(phydev->state));
return;
}
triggers, and we never do any of the phy_stop() cleanup. I'm not sure
what the best way to solve this is - introducing a PHY_ERROR state may
be a solution, but I think we want some phy_is_started() sites to
return true for it and others to return false.
Heiner - you introduced the above warning, could you look at improving
this case so we don't print a warning and taint the kernel when taking
a network device down after phy_error() please?
Thanks.
drivers/net/phy/phy.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy.c
index 49300fb59757..06fbca959383 100644
--- a/drivers/net/phy/phy.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy.c
@@ -663,7 +663,7 @@ void phy_stop_machine(struct phy_device *phydev)
*/
static void phy_error(struct phy_device *phydev)
{
- WARN_ON(1);
+ phydev_err(phydev, "Error detected, halting PHY\n");
mutex_lock(&phydev->lock);
phydev->state = PHY_HALTED;
--
2.20.1
next reply other threads:[~2019-12-17 12:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-17 12:53 Russell King [this message]
2019-12-17 21:41 ` [PATCH net] net: phy: make phy_error() report which PHY has failed Heiner Kallweit
2019-12-17 23:34 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-12-18 20:54 ` Heiner Kallweit
2019-12-18 22:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-12-19 7:10 ` Heiner Kallweit
2019-12-19 17:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-12-20 18:46 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-12-20 22:28 ` Heiner Kallweit
2019-12-19 20:50 ` David Miller
2019-12-19 21:05 ` Andrew Lunn
2019-12-19 22:14 ` David Miller
2019-12-19 21:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-12-20 9:18 ` Andrew Lunn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1ihCLZ-0001Vo-Nw@rmk-PC.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).