From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
imx@lists.linux.dev, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] net: stmmac: imx: fix iMX93 register definitions
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2026 10:37:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1vnaGl-00000007i9f-0ZMw@rmk-PC.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
When looking at the iMX93 documentation, the definitions in the driver
do not correspond with the documentation, which makes the driver
confusing.
The driver, for example, re-uses a definition for bit 0 for two
different registers, where this bit have completely different purposes.
Fix this by renaming the second register, and adding a definition that
reflects the true purpose of bit 0 in the first register (EQOS enable.)
Replace MX93_GPR_ENET_QOS_INTF_MODE_MASK with MX93_GPR_ENET_QOS_ENABLE
and MX93_GPR_ENET_QOS_INTF_SEL_MASK as MX93_GPR_ENET_QOS_INTF_MODE_MASK
is not a register field.
Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
---
.../net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-imx.c | 25 +++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-imx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-imx.c
index ecc0c3483423..c4e85197629d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-imx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-imx.c
@@ -28,11 +28,11 @@
#define GPR_ENET_QOS_CLK_TX_CLK_SEL (0x1 << 20)
#define GPR_ENET_QOS_RGMII_EN (0x1 << 21)
-#define MX93_GPR_ENET_QOS_INTF_MODE_MASK GENMASK(3, 0)
#define MX93_GPR_ENET_QOS_INTF_SEL_MASK GENMASK(3, 1)
-#define MX93_GPR_ENET_QOS_CLK_GEN_EN (0x1 << 0)
-#define MX93_GPR_ENET_QOS_CLK_SEL_MASK BIT_MASK(0)
-#define MX93_GPR_CLK_SEL_OFFSET (4)
+#define MX93_GPR_ENET_QOS_ENABLE BIT(0)
+
+#define MX93_ENET_CLK_SEL_OFFSET (4)
+#define MX93_ENET_QOS_CLK_TX_SEL_MASK BIT_MASK(0)
#define DMA_BUS_MODE 0x00001000
#define DMA_BUS_MODE_SFT_RESET (0x1 << 0)
@@ -95,17 +95,18 @@ static int imx93_set_intf_mode(struct imx_priv_data *dwmac, u8 phy_intf_sel)
if (phy_intf_sel == PHY_INTF_SEL_RMII && dwmac->rmii_refclk_ext) {
ret = regmap_clear_bits(dwmac->intf_regmap,
dwmac->intf_reg_off +
- MX93_GPR_CLK_SEL_OFFSET,
- MX93_GPR_ENET_QOS_CLK_SEL_MASK);
+ MX93_ENET_CLK_SEL_OFFSET,
+ MX93_ENET_QOS_CLK_TX_SEL_MASK);
if (ret)
return ret;
}
val = FIELD_PREP(MX93_GPR_ENET_QOS_INTF_SEL_MASK, phy_intf_sel) |
- MX93_GPR_ENET_QOS_CLK_GEN_EN;
+ MX93_GPR_ENET_QOS_ENABLE;
return regmap_update_bits(dwmac->intf_regmap, dwmac->intf_reg_off,
- MX93_GPR_ENET_QOS_INTF_MODE_MASK, val);
+ MX93_GPR_ENET_QOS_INTF_SEL_MASK |
+ MX93_GPR_ENET_QOS_ENABLE, val);
};
static int imx_dwmac_clks_config(void *priv, bool enabled)
@@ -205,7 +206,8 @@ static void imx93_dwmac_fix_speed(void *priv, int speed, unsigned int mode)
old_ctrl = readl(dwmac->base_addr + MAC_CTRL_REG);
ctrl = old_ctrl & ~CTRL_SPEED_MASK;
regmap_update_bits(dwmac->intf_regmap, dwmac->intf_reg_off,
- MX93_GPR_ENET_QOS_INTF_MODE_MASK, 0);
+ MX93_GPR_ENET_QOS_INTF_SEL_MASK |
+ MX93_GPR_ENET_QOS_ENABLE, 0);
writel(ctrl, dwmac->base_addr + MAC_CTRL_REG);
/* Ensure the settings for CTRL are applied. */
@@ -213,9 +215,10 @@ static void imx93_dwmac_fix_speed(void *priv, int speed, unsigned int mode)
usleep_range(10, 20);
iface &= MX93_GPR_ENET_QOS_INTF_SEL_MASK;
- iface |= MX93_GPR_ENET_QOS_CLK_GEN_EN;
+ iface |= MX93_GPR_ENET_QOS_ENABLE;
regmap_update_bits(dwmac->intf_regmap, dwmac->intf_reg_off,
- MX93_GPR_ENET_QOS_INTF_MODE_MASK, iface);
+ MX93_GPR_ENET_QOS_INTF_SEL_MASK |
+ MX93_GPR_ENET_QOS_ENABLE, iface);
writel(old_ctrl, dwmac->base_addr + MAC_CTRL_REG);
}
--
2.47.3
next reply other threads:[~2026-02-04 10:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-04 10:37 Russell King (Oracle) [this message]
2026-02-05 17:40 ` [PATCH net-next] net: stmmac: imx: fix iMX93 register definitions patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1vnaGl-00000007i9f-0ZMw@rmk-PC.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox