netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Nikolaos D. Bougalis" <nikb@webmaster.com>
To: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: Established connections hash function
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 05:45:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <EED139046EA84B0095BFB0ECB17BA288@XEON> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070323080715.GB29991@2ka.mipt.ru>

    Let me start off by saying that I hope I didn't come across as 
condenscending in my previous posts. If I did, then it wasn't intended. Now, 
on to more important things :)


> jhash_2words(const, const, ((const << 16) | $sport) ^ $random)
>
> where $sport is 1-65535 in a loop, and $random is pseudo-random number
> obtained on start.

    If you are correct that jhash_3words doesn't properly distribute the 
bits in 'c' (which I don't believe you are, but let's assume it for a 
second) then this function will also be broken:  jhash_2words calls 
jhash_3words; jhash_3words adds (a linear operation) initval and c before 
calling __jhash_mix. So, if there is a problem with passing values under the 
direct control of the attacker into 'c' both jhash_2words and jhash_3words 
are affected; in other words, this variant would also be flawed.


> Which is exactly the case of web server and attacker connects to 80 port
> from the same IP address and different source ports.
>
> Result with jenkins:
> 1 23880
> 2 12108
> 3 4040
> 4 1019
> 5 200
> 6 30
> 7 8
> 8 1
>
> Xor:
> 1 65536

    I believe that the XOR results, if generated by your test above, are 
somewhat meaningless because you're feeding what is ideal input into the XOR 
hash. Which means that you'll get a perfect distribution. With your input, 
one might as well suggest that using the remote port will give a perfect 
distribution, and it will, but only for that specific input.

    Just for kicks, I went to one of our servers, and did "netstat -n | grep 
ESTABLISHED" and ended up with 31072 distinct ip:port/ip:port 4-tuples which 
I then hashed into a 65536 bucket table. There are the results; feel free to 
draw your own conclusions:

[ I think this should come out looking good; sorry if whitespace is screwy ]

+---+-------+-------+-------+-------+
|   |  xor  | j2w 1 | j2w 2 | j3w 1 |
+---+-------+---------------+-------+
| 0 | 40868 | 40930 | 40767 | 40750 |
| 1 | 19208 | 19119 | 19382 | 19413 |
| 2 |  4636 |  4618 |  4576 |  4554 |
| 3 |   716 |   769 |   715 |   734 |
| 4 |    99 |    91 |    87 |    76 |
| 5 |     7 |     8 |     9 |     9 |
| 6 |     1 |     1 |     0 |     0 |
| 7 |     1 |     0 |     0 |     0 |
| 8 |     0 |     0 |     0 |     0 |
+---+-------+-------+-------+-------+

xor: the vanilla linux function
j2w 1 is my variant: jhash_2words(laddr + rport, raddr + lport, seed)
j2w 2 is your variant: jhash_2words(laddr, raddr, (rport << 16) ^ lport) ^ 
seed)
j3w: jhash_3words(laddr, raddr, (rport << 12) + lport, seed)

    The seed used for all the Jenkins hashes came from the low-order 32-bits 
returned by RDTSC, executed when the program started. It remained constant 
throughout the run. 8 runs where made, to ensure that the seed wasn't 
causing weirdness, all runs giving almost identical results. The Jenkins 
hashes did not use the extra 2 right-shifts to fold high-order bits into the 
low-order bits, that is employed by the XOR hash.

    -n 



  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-03-23 12:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-22 15:39 RFC: Established connections hash function Nikolaos D. Bougalis
2007-03-22 15:52 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-03-22 17:32   ` Nikolaos D. Bougalis
2007-03-22 18:21     ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-03-22 19:44       ` Nikolaos D. Bougalis
2007-03-22 19:56         ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-03-22 20:53           ` Nikolaos D. Bougalis
2007-03-23  7:52             ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-03-22 20:58         ` David Miller
2007-03-22 22:03           ` Eric Dumazet
2007-03-23  7:11             ` David Miller
2007-03-23  8:00               ` Eric Dumazet
2007-03-23 18:46                 ` David Miller
2007-03-23  8:07           ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-03-23  8:17             ` Eric Dumazet
2007-03-23  8:33               ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-03-23  9:10                 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-03-23 11:58             ` XOR hash beauty solved [Was: RFC: Established connections hash function] Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-03-23 12:51               ` Nikolaos D. Bougalis
2007-03-23 12:45             ` Nikolaos D. Bougalis [this message]
2007-03-27 14:11 ` RFC: Established connections hash function Andi Kleen
2007-03-28  5:01   ` Nikolaos D. Bougalis
2007-03-28  6:29     ` David Miller
2007-03-28  9:29     ` Andi Kleen
2007-03-28 10:45       ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-03-28 14:14         ` Andi Kleen
2007-03-28 13:50           ` Eric Dumazet
2007-03-28 14:52             ` Andi Kleen
2007-03-29  9:18               ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-03-28 14:17           ` RFC: Established connections hash function II Andi Kleen
2007-03-28 19:04           ` RFC: Established connections hash function David Miller
2007-03-28 20:12             ` Andi Kleen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-03-24 12:26 linux
2007-03-24 13:29 ` Evgeniy Polyakov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=EED139046EA84B0095BFB0ECB17BA288@XEON \
    --to=nikb@webmaster.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).