From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Jean-Baptiste Vignaud" <vignaud@xandmail.fr>
Subject: Re: [patch (testing)] Re: 2.6.20->2.6.21 - networking dies after
	random time
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 10:41:17 +0200
Message-ID: <JMJUST$9BEA6C68F4D3CDC22D78DD1BF4340016@xandmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Cc: "marcin\.slusarz" <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com>,
	"mingo" <mingo@elte.hu>, "tglx" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"shemminger" <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-net" <linux-net@vger.kernel.org>,
	"netdev" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"akpm" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"alan" <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: "jarkao2" <jarkao2@o2.pl>
Return-path: <linux-net-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Sender: linux-net-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

> For me it's enough too but Thomas seems to doubt.
> 
> You've written earlier that you've 2.6.23-rc1 with HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND
> prepared too. So, if this is not a great problem maybe you could try
> this first. Tomorrow Thomas may send something, so this 100HZ could
> wait yet, I hope?

Ok, i'll test 2.6.23-rc1 with HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND first.

Jb