From: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Cc: Joy Latten <latten@austin.ibm.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>,
Venkat Yekkirala <vyekkirala@trustedcs.com>,
Steve G <linux_4ever@yahoo.com>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
selinux@tycho.nsa.gov
Subject: Re: LSPP kernels (was Re: [PATCH]: SAD sometimes has double SAs).
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 13:11:07 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Line.LNX.4.64.0703281306560.4569@d.namei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1175100540.13618.67.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Eric Paris wrote:
> It is definitely NOT a shortcut into RHEL.
Ok, that was a poor choice of words on my part.
> I don't want to give the impression that upstream is not coming first.
> All the work is being done upstream either on netdev or linux-audit and
> then I pull it back into this LSPP kernel she talked about so that
> people interested primarily in the testing necessary to meet that
> particular government standard have a neat tidy little prebuild rpm to
> work with. Eventually all of these will show up in RHEL, but not until
> all of the patches i'm dealing with are upstream.
It seems my understanding wasn't clear on the overall workflow. If the
consensus is to stay with this scheme, then please disregard my previous
post.
--
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-28 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-23 22:58 [PATCH]: SAD sometimes has double SAs Joy Latten
2007-03-23 23:27 ` David Miller
2007-03-26 21:34 ` Eric Paris
2007-03-26 21:48 ` David Miller
2007-03-27 1:04 ` Joy Latten
2007-03-28 15:15 ` Joy Latten
2007-03-28 16:20 ` LSPP kernels (was Re: [PATCH]: SAD sometimes has double SAs) James Morris
2007-03-28 16:36 ` Paul Moore
2007-03-28 19:12 ` David Miller
2007-03-28 16:49 ` Eric Paris
2007-03-28 17:11 ` James Morris [this message]
2007-03-28 19:13 ` [PATCH]: SAD sometimes has double SAs David Miller
2007-03-26 23:25 ` Joy Latten
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Line.LNX.4.64.0703281306560.4569@d.namei \
--to=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=latten@austin.ibm.com \
--cc=linux_4ever@yahoo.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.moore@hp.com \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=vyekkirala@trustedcs.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).