From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Morris Subject: Re: LSPP kernels (was Re: [PATCH]: SAD sometimes has double SAs). Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 13:11:07 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: References: <200703232258.l2NMwKqH016994@faith.austin.ibm.com> <1174944899.17953.20.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070326.144843.72708308.davem@davemloft.net> <1174957467.3085.461.camel@faith.austin.ibm.com> <1175094915.3085.503.camel@faith.austin.ibm.com> <1175100540.13618.67.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Joy Latten , David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Herbert Xu , Paul Moore , Venkat Yekkirala , Steve G , Stephen Smalley , selinux@tycho.nsa.gov To: Eric Paris Return-path: Received: from mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net ([69.17.117.3]:53725 "EHLO mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964780AbXC1RLL (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Mar 2007 13:11:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1175100540.13618.67.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Eric Paris wrote: > It is definitely NOT a shortcut into RHEL. Ok, that was a poor choice of words on my part. > I don't want to give the impression that upstream is not coming first. > All the work is being done upstream either on netdev or linux-audit and > then I pull it back into this LSPP kernel she talked about so that > people interested primarily in the testing necessary to meet that > particular government standard have a neat tidy little prebuild rpm to > work with. Eventually all of these will show up in RHEL, but not until > all of the patches i'm dealing with are upstream. It seems my understanding wasn't clear on the overall workflow. If the consensus is to stay with this scheme, then please disregard my previous post. -- James Morris