From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Morris Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Add security check before flushing SAD/SPD Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 15:44:48 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: References: <200703262321.l2QNLZlR014240@faith.austin.ibm.com> <1180983953.3950.37.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, Joy Latten To: Eric Paris Return-path: Received: from mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net ([69.17.117.9]:39560 "EHLO mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758966AbXFDTow (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jun 2007 15:44:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1180983953.3950.37.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Eric Paris wrote: > Some time ago this thread bounced back and forth and seemed to come to > rest with the patch below, I cleaned up the comments and put all the > ACKs it received in one place below, but so much time has passed I doubt > if they should still count for free. I also rediffed the patch against > the latest miller tree. Is the idea or patch in any way flawed or > unacceptable to people at the moment? > > Anyone willing to step up an re-ack the patch to get it moving into the > tree? Looks good to me. Acked-by: James Morris -- James Morris