From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Morris Subject: Re: [RFC] Allow LSM to use IP address/port number. Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 19:41:19 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: References: <200707070225.AFC45609.MNStNTPG@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> <200707061343.03942.paul.moore@hp.com> <200707090533.l695X1PM059672@www262.sakura.ne.jp> <20070709.002629.28788394.davem@davemloft.net> <200707092213.HAC58314.WSNFtPGOFUE@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> <20070709160538.289d8ac2@freepuppy.rosehill.hemminger.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Tetsuo Handa , davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Hemminger Return-path: Received: from mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net ([69.17.117.9]:51097 "EHLO mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760779AbXGIXlX (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jul 2007 19:41:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070709160538.289d8ac2@freepuppy.rosehill.hemminger.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 9 Jul 2007, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > Isn't it better to hook into existing netfilter infrastructure somehow? Yes, it has been suggested several times. -- James Morris