From: "Noah J. Misch" <noah@caltech.edu>
To: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>,
Elmer.Joandi@ut.ee, elmer@ylenurme.ee
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: patches for PROC_FS=n (2.6.0-test7)
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 22:52:56 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0310132128450.8530@blinky> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031012201316.7ecf73c8.rddunlap@osdl.org>
Randy,
I poked around the driver a bit and uncovered a few points that suggest to me a
different approach to the problem.
The file arlan-proc.c contains a number of functions supporting the driver's
sysctl interface. Nothing in that file appears procfs-specific.
I would change the Makefile to compile arlan-proc.c depending on CONFIG_SYSCTL
and remove the #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS guarding much of that file. I would then
make arlan.h define macro or static inline stubs for init_arlan_proc and
cleanup_arlan_proc much like the current arlan.h does.
For the matter, perhaps one could add an extra config option, ARLAN_SYSCTL, that
depends on ARLAN and SYSCTL, and conditional-compile arlan-proc.c on that
instead of CONFIG_SYSCTL itself. That way, users could leave it out to save
space without zapping all sysctls. I would go for this approach myself.
The configuration help text for the arlan driver claims that it builds a module
for the driver and another for its sysctl interface. It doesn't do that at the
moment, but that is another option (though not one I like as much).
What do you think?
On Sun, 12 Oct 2003, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 16:06:29 -0700 (PDT) "Noah J. Misch" <noah@caltech.edu> wrote:
>
> | > There are several other drivers/protocols that don't build
> | > with PROC_FS=n, like arlan, siimage, ipx, llc, and bluetooth.
>
>
> Here's a patch for the wireless/arlan driver for PROC_FS=n.
> Currently it defines both a function and a macro for
> init_arlan_proc() if PROC_FS=n. This causes a bunch of
> compile-time errors.
>
> It looks to me like it should always call the init_arlan_proc()
> (and cleanup_arlan_proc()) functions since it inits some sysctl tables.
> Or am I misunderstanding it?
>
> Thanks,
> --
> ~Randy
>
>
> patch_name: arlan_noprocfs.patch
> patch_version: 2003-10-12.19:46:24
> author: Randy.Dunlap <rddunlap@osdl.org>
> description: use init_arlan_proc() for sysctl inits
> product: Linux
> product_versions: 2.6.0-test7
> diffstat: =
> drivers/net/wireless/arlan.h | 5 -----
> 1 files changed, 5 deletions(-)
>
>
> diff -Naur ./drivers/net/wireless/arlan.h~arlanprocfs ./drivers/net/wireless/arlan.h
> --- ./drivers/net/wireless/arlan.h~arlanprocfs 2003-10-08 12:24:08.000000000 -0700
> +++ ./drivers/net/wireless/arlan.h 2003-10-12 19:45:46.000000000 -0700
> @@ -39,13 +39,8 @@
> #define ARLAN_RCV_PROMISC 1
> #define ARLAN_RCV_CONTROL 2
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
> extern int init_arlan_proc(void);
> extern void cleanup_arlan_proc(void);
> -#else
> -#define init_arlan_proc() (0)
> -#define cleanup_arlan_proc() do { } while (0);
> -#endif
>
> extern struct net_device *arlan_device[MAX_ARLANS];
> extern int arlan_debug;
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-14 5:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.GSO.4.58.0310101519330.9806@inky>
2003-10-13 2:17 ` patches for PROC_FS=n (2.6.0-test7) Randy.Dunlap
2003-10-14 5:17 ` Noah J. Misch
2003-10-13 3:13 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-10-13 11:31 ` Elmer
2003-10-13 14:49 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-10-14 5:52 ` Noah J. Misch [this message]
2003-10-14 6:12 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-10-14 8:39 ` Elmer
2003-10-10 21:16 Randy.Dunlap
2003-10-11 19:08 ` David S. Miller
2003-10-11 19:40 ` Sam Ravnborg
2003-10-11 19:40 ` David S. Miller
2003-10-12 3:24 ` Randy.Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.GSO.4.58.0310132128450.8530@blinky \
--to=noah@caltech.edu \
--cc=Elmer.Joandi@ut.ee \
--cc=elmer@ylenurme.ee \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=rddunlap@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).