From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ralph Doncaster Subject: Re: Route cache performance under stress Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 20:56:43 -0400 (EDT) Sender: linux-net-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: References: <20030609082718.GG20613@netnation.com> <004f01c32ebe$b4bd88d0$4a00000a@badass> <20030609221911.GF11509@netnation.com> Reply-To: ralph+d@istop.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: CIT/Paul , "'David S. Miller'" , "hadi@shell.cyberus.ca" , "fw@deneb.enyo.de" , "netdev@oss.sgi.com" , "linux-net@vger.kernel.org" Return-path: To: Simon Kirby In-Reply-To: <20030609221911.GF11509@netnation.com> List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, Simon Kirby wrote: > [sroot@r2:/root]# while (1) > [sroot@r2:(while)]# sleep 1 > [sroot@r2:(while)]# ip -o route show cache | wc -l > [sroot@r2:(while)]# end I considered doing the same test on my box, but I don't have enough juice left to do it every second: root@tor-router# time ip -o route show cache | wc -l 15023 real 0m1.563s user 0m0.380s sys 0m1.180s So instead... root@tor-router# while (true); do sleep 5; ip -o route show cache | wc -l; done 12630 15659 17951 20733 8875 9282 11913 4216 9437 11973 14503 17088 -Ralph