From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ralph Doncaster Subject: Re: Route cache performance under stress Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 19:58:47 -0400 (EDT) Sender: linux-net-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: References: <16102.9418.43884.336925@robur.slu.se> <20030610.115759.26513736.davem@redhat.com> <20030610.152020.59678979.davem@redhat.com> Reply-To: ralph+d@istop.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: "Robert.Olsson@data.slu.se" , "hadi@shell.cyberus.ca" , "xerox@foonet.net" , "sim@netnation.com" , "fw@deneb.enyo.de" , "netdev@oss.sgi.com" , "linux-net@vger.kernel.org" Return-path: To: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20030610.152020.59678979.davem@redhat.com> List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, David S. Miller wrote: > From: Ralph Doncaster > What's the do_gettimeofday for? > > Every packet records a timestamp. I'm not aware of anything in IP routing that requires a timestamp for every packet. To me it sounds like we could rip that out too. -Ralph