From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Samuel Ortiz Subject: Re: wireless: recap of current issues (configuration) Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 22:10:51 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: References: <20060113212605.GD16166@tuxdriver.com> <20060113213011.GE16166@tuxdriver.com> <20060113221935.GJ16166@tuxdriver.com> <1137191522.2520.63.camel@localhost> <20060114011726.GA19950@shaftnet.org> <43C97605.9030907@pobox.com> <20060115152034.GA1722@shaftnet.org> <43CAA853.8020409@errno.com> <20060116172817.GB8596@shaftnet.org> <20060116195008.GB12748@shaftnet.org> Reply-To: samuel.ortiz@nokia.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Sam Leffler , Jeff Garzik , Johannes Berg , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: To: ext Stuffed Crust In-Reply-To: <20060116195008.GB12748@shaftnet.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 16 Jan 2006, ext Stuffed Crust wrote: > You may hear another beacon when the STA is awake, you may not. BSSID > filtering has nothing to do with 802.11 power save, but rather is > intented to reduce the host load (interrupts, processing overhead) and > thus the host power consumption. I know that and I know a bit about 802.11 PS as well. I was talking about host powersaving, not 802.11. Sorry for the confusion. What I meant is that having an 802.11 stack capable of living with less than a beacon every couple of beacon intervals would be nice as well. Cheers, Samuel.