From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julian Anastasov Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] ipvs: Syncrhonise Closing of Connections Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 01:36:07 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: References: <20071101092818.083169402@vergenet.net> <20071101093022.688977274@vergenet.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: lvs-devel@linuxvirtualserver.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Wensong Zhang , "Rumen G. Bogdanovski" , Graeme Fowler , Joseph Mack NA3T , "David S. Miller" To: Simon Horman Return-path: Received: from ja.ssi.bg ([217.79.71.194]:4211 "EHLO u.domain.uli" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754412AbXKAXls (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Nov 2007 19:41:48 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20071101093022.688977274@vergenet.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Hello, On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, Simon Horman wrote: > --- net-2.6.orig/net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c 2007-11-01 18:17:55.000000000 +0900 > +++ net-2.6/net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c 2007-11-01 18:20:30.000000000 +0900 > @@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ static void ip_vs_process_message(const > s->daddr, s->dport, > flags, dest); > if (dest) Is that correct? Sorry, I was flooded with different versions of this patch and I'm not sure if it is the final one. > - atomic_dec(&dest->refcnt); > + ip_vs_dest_get(dest); > if (!cp) { > IP_VS_ERR("ip_vs_conn_new failed\n"); > return; Regards -- Julian Anastasov