From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julian Anastasov Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2.6.24] fib: fix route replacement, fib_info is shared Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 12:56:08 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: References: <20080127232018.GA2856@ami.dom.local> <20080129084915.GA1624@ff.dom.local> <20080129091030.GB1624@ff.dom.local> <20080129095245.GA2570@ff.dom.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: "David S. Miller" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Joonwoo Park To: Jarek Poplawski Return-path: Received: from ja.ssi.bg ([217.79.71.194]:48942 "EHLO u.domain.uli" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1763492AbYBBKzU (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Feb 2008 05:55:20 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20080129095245.GA2570@ff.dom.local> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hello, On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > ...On the other hand, I wonder how bad would be switching these two > to avoid this error? After all "replace" with this "add or change" > meaning looks quite permissive, and after all it was used before with > no such errors, so, even if correct, it could still break some > scripts... Agreed, what could break are scripts that add 2 equal alternative routes and checking for errors. BTW, I tried to add more information and that is what I have finally: http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/fib.txt Regards -- Julian Anastasov