From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Henrik Nordstrom Subject: Re: Do you know the TCP stack? (127.x.x.x routing) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 11:10:07 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: <20050306173145.GQ31837@postel.suug.ch> <3sp35g$7hpm0@smtp04.mrf.mail.rcn.net> <422C0B50.20500@mrv.com> <3sp35g$7rsc1@smtp04.mrf.mail.rcn.net> <1110288879.1050.167.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20050308135134.GA20607@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <1110290300.1050.190.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20050308140301.GC20607@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <1110291470.1043.211.camel@jzny.localdomain> <1110316631.1084.57.camel@jzny.localdomain> <1110377889.1090.124.camel@jzny.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: linux-net@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com To: Jason Lunz In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-net-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Jason Lunz wrote: > interfaces. I don't know whether policy routing gives enough control to > do this in a general fashion; Not easily. The problem is to determine which path packets you send should take if the destination is on both sides. You can do some magics with connection tracking and CONNMARK and magic routing tables infront of the local table and disabling the martian checks, but not everything can be solved in this manner. Regards Henrik