netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arthur Kepner <akepner@sgi.com>
To: Ravinandan Arakali <ravinandan.arakali@neterion.com>
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	"Leonid. Grossman (E-mail)" <leonid.grossman@neterion.com>,
	"Raghavendra. Koushik (E-mail)"
	<raghavendra.koushik@neterion.com>
Subject: Re: High CPU utilization with Bonding driver ?
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 10:29:07 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0503291027240.23261@linux.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <001601c5348c$3f417f50$3a10100a@pc.s2io.com>


On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Ravinandan Arakali wrote:

> ....
> Results(8 nttcp/chariot streams):
> ---------------------------------
> 1. Combined throughputs(but no bonding):
> 3.1 + 6.2 = 9.3 Gbps with 58% CPU idle.
> 
> 2. eth0 and eth1 bonded together in LACP mode:
> 8.2 Gbps with 1% CPU idle.
> 
> From the above results, when Bonding driver is used(#2), the CPUs are
> completely maxed out compared to the case when traffic is run
> simultaneously on both the cards(#1).
> Can anybody suggest some reasons for the above behavior ?
> 

Ravi;

Have you tried this patch? 

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev&m=111091146828779&w=2

If not, it will likely go a long way to solving your 
problem.

--
Arthur

  reply	other threads:[~2005-03-29 18:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-29 18:22 High CPU utilization with Bonding driver ? Ravinandan Arakali
2005-03-29 18:29 ` Arthur Kepner [this message]
2005-03-29 19:13   ` Ravinandan Arakali
2005-04-05  0:49   ` Ravinandan Arakali
2005-04-05  3:03     ` Arthur Kepner
2005-04-05 19:04       ` Ravinandan Arakali
2005-04-05 20:31         ` Jay Vosburgh
2005-04-05 21:40           ` Ravinandan Arakali
2005-04-13 21:29       ` Ravinandan Arakali

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.61.0503291027240.23261@linux.site \
    --to=akepner@sgi.com \
    --cc=bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=leonid.grossman@neterion.com \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=raghavendra.koushik@neterion.com \
    --cc=ravinandan.arakali@neterion.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).