From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rik van Riel Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2005-discuss] Summary of 2005 Kernel Summit Proposed Topics Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:50:14 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: References: <20050326224621.61f6d917.davem@davemloft.net> <1112027284.5531.27.camel@mulgrave> <20050329152008.GD63268@muc.de> <1112116762.5088.65.camel@beastie> <1112130512.1077.107.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20050330152208.GB12672@muc.de> <20050330153313.GD32111@g5.random> <20050330153948.GE12672@muc.de> <20050330154418.GE32111@g5.random> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Andi Kleen , jamal , Dmitry Yusupov , James Bottomley , mpm@selenic.com, michaelc@cs.wisc.edu, open-iscsi@googlegroups.com, ksummit-2005-discuss@thunk.org, netdev Return-path: To: Andrea Arcangeli In-Reply-To: <20050330154418.GE32111@g5.random> Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 05:39:48PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > An unsolveable one IMHO. You can just try to be good enough. For that > > I think it's solvable with an algorithm I outlined several emails ago. Agreed, this is definately solvable. If people don't agree, we should probably fight this out at the kernel summit. ;) -- "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan