From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2005-discuss] Summary of 2005 Kernel Summit Proposed
 Topics
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:04:43 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0503311404170.8643@chimarrao.boston.redhat.com>
References: <20050330161522.GH32111@g5.random> <20050331114122.GL24804@muc.de>
 <Pine.LNX.4.61.0503310711430.21935@chimarrao.boston.redhat.com>
 <20050331185954.GR24804@muc.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: Alex Aizman <itn780@yahoo.com>, open-iscsi@googlegroups.com,
        "'jamal'" <hadi@cyberus.ca>, "'Dmitry Yusupov'" <dmitry_yus@yahoo.com>,
        "'James Bottomley'" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
        mpm@selenic.com, michaelc@cs.wisc.edu, ksummit-2005-discuss@thunk.org,
        "'netdev'" <netdev@oss.sgi.com>
Return-path: <netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
In-Reply-To: <20050331185954.GR24804@muc.de>
Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Andi Kleen wrote:

> I was talking about the hardware limits for early filtering,
> not the size of the mempools.

That should not be an issue, since packets in those
buffers don't stick around, but can be throw away
at will.

-- 
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan