From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] SECMARK 1.0
Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 14:56:05 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0605091455170.26836@d.namei>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0605071104590.8588@d.namei>  <445E288B.4040908@gentoo.org>
 <Pine.LNX.4.64.0605071323330.9423@d.namei>  <1147110088.32719.56.camel@jackjack.columbia.tresys.com>
  <Pine.LNX.4.64.0605081719440.18947@d.namei>
 <1147181085.32719.105.camel@jackjack.columbia.tresys.com>
 <Pine.LNX.4.64.0605091229190.25948@d.namei> <1147194399.32719.148.camel@jackjack.columbia.tresys.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: Joshua Brindle <method@gentoo.org>, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
	Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>,
	netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net ([69.17.117.8]:11493 "EHLO
	mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751077AbWEIS4J (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 9 May 2006 14:56:09 -0400
To: Karl MacMillan <kmacmillan@tresys.com>
In-Reply-To: <1147194399.32719.148.camel@jackjack.columbia.tresys.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 9 May 2006, Karl MacMillan wrote:

> Ok - I obviously don't have the expertise to judge how ugly the code to
> do this is. It becomes a question of whether the feature is compelling
> enough.

Atcually, I think there may be a good way to do this, will investigate.


- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>