From: Chris Caputo <ccaputo@alt.net>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org
Cc: Paul Jakma <paul@clubi.ie>
Subject: possible problem with TSO and ip_queue
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 18:44:30 +0000 (GMT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0605101815430.16614@nacho.alt.net> (raw)
Environment is 2.6.16.9 with e1000 NICs.
Paul and I (as part of the Quagga project) are working on a user mode
method for doing BGP MD5 checksums using ip_queue. All is working except
when TSO is enabled I am seeing some problems.
It appears that when TSO is enabled, ip_queue can be used to manipulate
packets that have a size higher than the particular MSS (and MTU) for a
TCP stream.
This results in a larger than MSS packet going out to the NIC with a TCP
MD5 checksum, getting split by the NIC to match the MTU of the LAN, and
then being received as multiple packets with incorrect MD5 checksums.
Then a retransmit with a smaller/correct MSS happens and the packets are
received with valid MD5 checksums.
So in effect, the data eventually makes it across the link, but it is sent
twice, once with invalid checksums and once with valid checksums, and
throughput is slow.
When TSO is disabled, things happen as they should.
Does this sound like a bug or by design?
Does it make sense that ip_queue mangled packets be subjected to TSO,
given that the TCP header can be messed with by the user mode code?
Chris
next reply other threads:[~2006-05-10 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-10 18:44 Chris Caputo [this message]
2006-05-10 19:49 ` possible problem with TSO and ip_queue David S. Miller
2006-05-10 20:07 ` Paul Jakma
2006-05-10 20:09 ` David S. Miller
2006-05-10 20:17 ` Paul Jakma
2006-05-10 20:30 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0605101815430.16614@nacho.alt.net \
--to=ccaputo@alt.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=paul@clubi.ie \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox