From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] SECMARK 1.1
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 02:22:14 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0605150221000.1275@d.namei>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0605071104590.8588@d.namei>
 <Pine.LNX.4.64.0605140133560.5506@d.namei> <446778F0.6000705@trash.net>
 <Pine.LNX.4.64.0605150004590.645@d.namei> <446811D3.5080905@trash.net>
 <Pine.LNX.4.64.0605150153590.1275@d.namei> <446819FE.8050300@trash.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org,
	Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
	Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>,
	Karl MacMillan <kmacmillan@tresys.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Thomas Bleher <bleher@informatik.uni-muenchen.de>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net ([69.17.117.3]:23954 "EHLO
	mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S932273AbWEOGWQ (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 15 May 2006 02:22:16 -0400
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
In-Reply-To: <446819FE.8050300@trash.net>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Mon, 15 May 2006, Patrick McHardy wrote:

> > Not sure what you mean: it will cause ip_conntrack to be loaded, which 
> > is needed when you specify the track flag.
> 
> 
> Yes, but the reason why it is loaded is because the module loader needs
> to resolve the symbol, not because of anything done at module runtime.

Am I missing something?  This is what I want to happen.  If you specify 
SECMARK --track,  ip_conntrack is to be loaded.


-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>