From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Morris Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] LSM-IPsec SELinux Authorize Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 18:32:09 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: References: <20060605195607.GA28030@jiayuguan.watson.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, chrisw@osdl.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, sds@tycho.nsa.gov, tjaeger@cse.psu.edu, latten@austin.ibm.com, sergeh@us.ibm.com, gcwilson@us.ibm.com, czhang.us@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net ([69.17.117.10]:49327 "EHLO mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750785AbWFEWcN (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jun 2006 18:32:13 -0400 To: Catherine Zhang In-Reply-To: <20060605195607.GA28030@jiayuguan.watson.ibm.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 5 Jun 2006, Catherine Zhang wrote: Looks ok to me, except for one minor nit: > + if (ctx) { > + rc = avc_has_perm(tsec->sid, ctx->ctx_sid, > + SECCLASS_ASSOCIATION, > + ASSOCIATION__SETCONTEXT, NULL); > + } you don't need the braces here (similar again further in the patch). - James -- James Morris