From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Morris Subject: Re: Refactor Netlink connector? Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 11:19:20 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: References: <20060527134629.GA16306@2ka.mipt.ru> <20060531030046.GC7844@postel.suug.ch> <1149078055.5462.55.camel@jzny2> <20060531130649.GD7844@postel.suug.ch> <1149081752.5462.98.camel@jzny2> <20060601104506.GF7844@postel.suug.ch> <1150288564.5233.31.camel@jzny2> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Stephen Smalley , "David S. Miller" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Evgeniy Polyakov , Thomas Graf Return-path: Received: from mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net ([69.17.117.3]:7058 "EHLO mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964929AbWFNPTX (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jun 2006 11:19:23 -0400 To: jamal In-Reply-To: <1150288564.5233.31.camel@jzny2> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, jamal wrote: > > So whats the resolution on this? I actually have some cycles this coming > weekend that i was hopping to spend updating the doc instead. Haven't had a chance to look at it since. -- James Morris