From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Morris Subject: Re: [take12 0/3] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism. Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:59:54 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: References: <1156230051.8055.27.camel@entropy> <20060822072448.GA5126@2ka.mipt.ru> <1156234672.8055.51.camel@entropy> <20060822.012341.57449506.davem@davemloft.net> <1156237191.8055.59.camel@entropy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: David Miller , johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, drepper@redhat.com, akpm@osdl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, zach.brown@oracle.com, hch@infradead.org Return-path: Received: from mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net ([69.17.117.7]:13239 "EHLO mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932296AbWHVO75 (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:59:57 -0400 To: Nicholas Miell In-Reply-To: <1156237191.8055.59.camel@entropy> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 22 Aug 2006, Nicholas Miell wrote: > In this brave new world of always stable kernel development, the time a > new interface has for public testing before a new kernel release is > drastically shorter than the old unstable development series, and if > nobody is documenting how this stuff is supposed to work and > demonstrating how it will be used, then mistakes are bound to slip > through. Feel free to provide the documentation. Perhaps, even as much as you've written so far in these emails would be enough. - James -- James Morris