From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Morris Subject: Re: Is TCP over IPsec broken in 2.6.18? Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 10:44:31 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: References: <20060925103836.GA13966@2ka.mipt.ru> <20060925112754.GA18228@gondor.apana.org.au> <20060925120519.GA19010@2ka.mipt.ru> <20060930111521.GA646@2ka.mipt.ru> <20060930144018.GA16918@2ka.mipt.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Smalley Return-path: Received: from mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net ([69.17.117.8]:63623 "EHLO mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751034AbWI3Ood (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Sep 2006 10:44:33 -0400 To: Evgeniy Polyakov In-Reply-To: <20060930144018.GA16918@2ka.mipt.ru> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Sat, 30 Sep 2006, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 10:36:29AM -0400, James Morris (jmorris@namei.org) wrote: > > On Sat, 30 Sep 2006, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > > > > > I need to cofirm that broken system in my setup does have selinux enabled > > > with enforcing mode. > > > I've changed it to permissive mode and it fixed setup (I do not see any > > > warnings in dmesg). > > > > Something better in your case would likely be to rebuild the kernel with > > CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK_XFRM=n until it's fixed. > > Well, it is acrypto test machine and I do not care about security there, > so I can even disable selinux completely, but it will not help to resolve > the issue, right? Yes, it is a workaround. > > So if you have some patches I'm more than happy to test them. Ok, coming soon. -- James Morris