From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Morris Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] [PATCH 0/2] Updated NetLabel/secid-reconciliation bits and a bugfix Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 14:44:03 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: References: <20061004154629.186531000@hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, eparis@redhat.com, sds@tycho.nsa.gov, vyekkirala@TrustedCS.com Return-path: Received: from mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net ([69.17.117.5]:38023 "EHLO mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422733AbWJDSoF (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Oct 2006 14:44:05 -0400 To: paul.moore@hp.com In-Reply-To: <20061004154629.186531000@hp.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 4 Oct 2006, paul.moore@hp.com wrote: > This patchset includes an update to the NetLabel/secid-reconciliation patch, > replacing my "v3" patch from earlier this week, and a bugfix patch to cure a > race condition found during testing this week. The bugfix patch does not > rely on the secid patches and should be merged regardless as it fixes a bug > which has been around since the very first NetLabel patches (not sure why I > didn't see this sooner). So, patch 2/2 should go in on it's own against upstream? If so, in 5B future, please post such patches separately. As for the rest of the network labeling, please work together with Venkat and the SELinux developers on a final patchset which meets all of the design goals and has been tested, with policy which has been merged upstream and is available via Fedora devel. Please keep the discussion going, but ensure that the final patchset for review and merge consideration is a complete set against the current git kernel coming from one person. Thanks, - James -- James Morris