From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 11:59:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <18115.52863.638655.658466@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <6370BBDF-0C79-41EB-BD2A-02AA0D216924@mac.com> <200709101438.36710.vda.linux@googlemail.com> <200709101516.03234.vda.linux@googlemail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Denys Vlasenko , Kyle Moffett , Arjan van de Ven , Nick Piggin , Satyam Sharma , Herbert Xu , Paul Mackerras , Chris Snook , Ilpo Jarvinen , "Paul E. McKenney" , Stefan Richter , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Netdev , Andrew Morton , ak@suse.de, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, David Miller , schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, wensong@linux-vs.org, horms@verge.net.au, wjiang@resilience.com, cfriesen@nortel.com, zlynx@acm.org, rpjday@mindspring.com, jesper.juhl@gmail.com, segher@kernel.crashing.org To: Linus Torvalds Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 10 Sep 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote: > The fact is, "volatile" *only* makes things worse. It generates worse > code, and never fixes any real bugs. This is a *fact*. Yes, lets just drop the volatiles now! We need a patch that gets rid of them.... Volunteers?