From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
To: Brian Vowell <brian.vowell@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 10767] New: Seg Fault Instead of Swapping
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 23:18:04 +0300 (EEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0805212310050.7747@wrl-59.cs.helsinki.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cf4145200805211140o3b2287dcsc57f8a78aa48a99d@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 21 May 2008, Brian Vowell wrote:
> Please forgive my lack of technical skills-- I am not a developer.
And I'm having problem in figuring out what is actually being reported
here... so pleasy forgive my possibly stupid comments... :-)
> The bug report referenced below recently occurred on a pretty busy file
> server of mine running Fedora 8 with a custom 2.6.25.4 kernel. The attached
> hardware RAID controller presents 12 LUNs, which were striped using the
> Linux mdadm tools, and then the Linux LVM was used to create a single
> logical volume. The filesystem used is XFS.
>
> Since upgrading from 2.6.25.3 to 2.6.25.4, my log has shown a large number
> of errors that I don't possess the skills to diagnose which component is
> actually causing the errors. I can verify however, that the hardware is
> good. I have run memtest86 and the vendor's diagnostic tools and verified
> that everything is running well.
At least the TCP thing is known to be in core TCP but it's just hard to
debug and that's why it hasn't yet been closed, no hw is suspect due to
it. But this other stacktrace seems to be something unrelated to TCP...:
> The errors in /var/log/messages look like this:
> May 19 06:30:30 ishtar kernel: Call Trace:
> May 19 06:30:30 ishtar kernel: <IRQ> [<ffffffff81075d35>]
> __alloc_pages+0x33f/0x35a
> May 19 06:30:30 ishtar kernel: [<ffffffff8100e813>] do_IRQ+0x13e/0x15f
> May 19 06:30:30 ishtar kernel: [<ffffffff810934a4>] new_slab+0x3f/0x242
> May 19 06:30:30 ishtar kernel: [<ffffffff81093bba>]
> __slab_alloc+0x212/0x43b
> May 19 06:30:30 ishtar kernel: [<ffffffff8128654c>]
> __netdev_alloc_skb+0x29/0x43
> May 19 06:30:30 ishtar kernel: [<ffffffff8128654c>]
> __netdev_alloc_skb+0x29/0x43
> May 19 06:30:30 ishtar kernel: [<ffffffff81094bd6>]
> __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x75/0xab
> May 19 06:30:30 ishtar kernel: [<ffffffff8128584a>] __alloc_skb+0x6a/0x133
> May 19 06:30:30 ishtar kernel: [<ffffffff8128654c>]
> __netdev_alloc_skb+0x29/0x43
> May 19 06:30:30 ishtar kernel: [<ffffffff8123a405>]
> tg3_alloc_rx_skb+0xc4/0x153
> May 19 06:30:30 ishtar kernel: [<ffffffff81241343>] tg3_poll+0x3be/0x7df
> May 19 06:30:30 ishtar kernel: [<ffffffff8128c2ce>]
> net_rx_action+0xb6/0x1bf
> May 19 06:30:30 ishtar kernel: [<ffffffff8103919b>] __do_softirq+0x65/0xce
> May 19 06:30:30 ishtar kernel: [<ffffffff8100ce9c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x28
> May 19 06:30:30 ishtar kernel: [<ffffffff8100e544>] do_softirq+0x2c/0x68
> May 19 06:30:30 ishtar kernel: [<ffffffff810390f2>] irq_exit+0x3f/0x83
> May 19 06:30:30 ishtar kernel: [<ffffffff8100e813>] do_IRQ+0x13e/0x15f
> May 19 06:30:30 ishtar kernel: [<ffffffff8100c221>] ret_from_intr+0x0/0xa
> May 19 06:30:30 ishtar kernel: <EOI> [<ffffffff8100adc8>]
> default_idle+0x0/0x55
> May 19 06:30:30 ishtar kernel: [<ffffffff8101c138>]
> lapic_next_event+0x0/0xa
> May 19 06:30:30 ishtar kernel: [<ffffffff8100adc8>] default_idle+0x0/0x55
> May 19 06:30:30 ishtar kernel: [<ffffffff8100adf9>] default_idle+0x31/0x55
> May 19 06:30:30 ishtar kernel: [<ffffffff8100adf4>] default_idle+0x2c/0x55
> May 19 06:30:30 ishtar kernel: [<ffffffff8100adc8>] default_idle+0x0/0x55
> May 19 06:30:30 ishtar kernel: [<ffffffff8100ae94>] cpu_idle+0x77/0x9a
>
> The hardware is an HP Proliant DL145G2, Dual Core Opteron 275 processor, 4GB
> of RAM, dual Broadcom GigE NICs bonded with Linux bonding driver, dual
> software RAID SATA disks for boot and swap.
>
> The call trace included with the bug report is the only one that appears in
> the log with the "cut here" lines.
>
>
>
>
> On 5/21/08, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > (switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
> > bugzilla web interface).
> >
> > On Wed, 21 May 2008 02:45:59 -0700 (PDT) bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.orgwrote:
> >
> > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10767
> > >
> > > Summary: Seg Fault Instead of Swapping
> >
> > Strange description?
> >
> > > Product: Networking
> > > Version: 2.5
> > > KernelVersion: 2.6.25.4
> > > Platform: All
> > > OS/Version: Linux
> > > Tree: Mainline
> > > Status: NEW
> > > Severity: normal
> > > Priority: P1
> > > Component: IPV4
> > > AssignedTo: shemminger@linux-foundation.org
> > > ReportedBy: brian.vowell@gmail.com
> > >
> > >
> > > May 20 13:11:00 ishtar kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > > May 20 13:11:00 ishtar kernel: WARNING: at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:2539
> > > tcp_ack+0xd2b/0x191f()
> >
> > In 2.6.25 this is
> >
> > if (WARN_ON(!tp->sacked_out && tp->fackets_out))
> > tp->fackets_out = 0;
...This TCP warning isn't sign of a problem that would cause corruption of
any kind (and the state inconsistency gets repaired there as well!), we're
debugging this already with couple of other people, so unless you have
some very good reproducer case you'll just have to wait a bit.
--
i.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-21 20:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-10767-10286@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2008-05-21 17:57 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 10767] New: Seg Fault Instead of Swapping Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <cf4145200805211140o3b2287dcsc57f8a78aa48a99d@mail.gmail.com>
2008-05-21 18:53 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-21 20:18 ` Ilpo Järvinen [this message]
[not found] ` <cf4145200805211345y3b00d209o58e11a7b553cdfc6@mail.gmail.com>
2008-05-23 10:25 ` Ilpo Järvinen
[not found] ` <cf4145200805230906k34a0452at773e840b791e6b0a@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <cf4145200805231024w2e735fb8ifecf7e2e1bab5957@mail.gmail.com>
2008-05-23 18:01 ` Ilpo Järvinen
[not found] ` <cf4145200805231126y401c2454w97e5305346aa8acd@mail.gmail.com>
2008-05-24 8:57 ` Ilpo Järvinen
[not found] ` <cf4145200805240706p2eb54e9ei51bc33f782ff5aef@mail.gmail.com>
2008-05-26 11:24 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-06-03 23:35 ` David Miller
2008-06-04 7:12 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-06-04 18:20 ` David Miller
2008-05-26 11:33 ` Ilpo Järvinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0805212310050.7747@wrl-59.cs.helsinki.fi \
--to=ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brian.vowell@gmail.com \
--cc=bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).