From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexey Toptygin Subject: Re: ip address delete bug? Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 21:23:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <200593200127124@mail.routehat.org> <4342D3F9.80705@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl, netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: To: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger In-Reply-To: <4342D3F9.80705@gmx.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: lartc-bounces@mailman.ds9a.nl Errors-To: lartc-bounces@mailman.ds9a.nl List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 4 Oct 2005, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > OK, I found out that this is documented behaviour, although the hint is not > in the man page. If it's not in the man page, then where is the below quote from? > "secondary --- this address is not used when selecting the default source > address for outgoing packets. An IP address becomes secondary if another > address within the same prefix (network) already exists. The first address > within the prefix is primary and is the tag address for the group of all the > secondary addresses. When the primary address is deleted all of the > secondaries are purged too." > > That means there is no way to change the IP of an interface if the prefix and > network size stay the same. Are there any plans to fix that? What's wrong with delete followed by add? This thread started on netdev, so I'm cc-ing that, in case someone doesn't read both lists. Alexey