From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45968C433E6 for ; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 19:31:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1196522262 for ; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 19:31:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726348AbgL3Tbk (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Dec 2020 14:31:40 -0500 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:44912 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726185AbgL3Tbj (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Dec 2020 14:31:39 -0500 Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1kuhBM-00F5z5-Ki; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 20:30:52 +0100 Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 20:30:52 +0100 From: Andrew Lunn To: Pali =?iso-8859-1?Q?Roh=E1r?= Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux admin , Heiner Kallweit , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Marek =?iso-8859-1?Q?Beh=FAn?= , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] net: sfp: add workaround for Realtek RTL8672 and RTL9601C chips Message-ID: References: <20201230154755.14746-1-pali@kernel.org> <20201230154755.14746-2-pali@kernel.org> <20201230161036.GR1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20201230165634.c4ty3mw6djezuyq6@pali> <20201230170546.GU1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20201230174307.lvehswvj5q6c6vk3@pali> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201230174307.lvehswvj5q6c6vk3@pali> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org > Ok! > > So should we completely skip hwmon_device_register_with_info() call > if (i2c_block_size < 2) ? Yep. That would be a nice simple test. But does ethtool -m still export the second page? That is also unreliable. Andrew