From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Morris Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mlsxfrm: Various fixes Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 02:02:14 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: References: <000501c70342$83b9df70$cc0a010a@tcssec.com> <4552A9AC.3060708@hp.com> <4552B5C1.8040007@hp.com> <4552CD3B.40809@hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: vyekkirala@TrustedCS.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, sds@tycho.nsa.gov Return-path: Received: from mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net ([69.17.117.4]:5100 "EHLO mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754353AbWKIHCQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Nov 2006 02:02:16 -0500 To: Paul Moore In-Reply-To: <4552CD3B.40809@hp.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 9 Nov 2006, Paul Moore wrote: > It sounds like you have an idea of how you would like to see this implemented, > can you give me a rough outline? Is this the partitioned SECMARK field you > talked about earlier? No, just the fact that you are in the same kernel address space and can readily access the security context of the peer. - James -- James Morris