From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dccp: remove module exit functions
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 11:27:26 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <XMMS.LNX.4.64.0611101126150.15046@d.namei>
References: <XMMS.LNX.4.64.0611100345300.10983@d.namei>
 <39e6f6c70611100555u6e2a4e0fq8dba12557f40139b@mail.gmail.com>
 <XMMS.LNX.4.64.0611101122520.15046@d.namei>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "dccp (vger)" <dccp@vger.kernel.org>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net ([69.17.117.8]:56272 "EHLO
	mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1946771AbWKJQ12 (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 10 Nov 2006 11:27:28 -0500
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <XMMS.LNX.4.64.0611101122520.15046@d.namei>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Fri, 10 Nov 2006, James Morris wrote:

> I wonder if this facility can be integrated more generally into the kernel 
> protocol which people are developing.

Ugh, editor screwup.  That was meant to be 

I wonder if this facility can be integrated more generally into the kernel 
as a kernel hacking option, as this is not the only protocol which people 
are developing.



> 
> Where is the patch you use?
> 
> 
> 
> - James
> 

-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>