From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Morris Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] A bugfix patchset for NetLabel Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 20:19:56 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: References: <20061215214926.018950000@hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov Return-path: Received: from mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net ([69.17.117.8]:46340 "EHLO mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030526AbWLPB0i (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Dec 2006 20:26:38 -0500 To: paul.moore@hp.com In-Reply-To: <20061215214926.018950000@hp.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, paul.moore@hp.com wrote: > This patch set fixes two bugs that were found recently when adding new CIPSOv4 > DOI definitions. These patches are pretty small and have been tested by a few > different people on several different platforms. Applied to git://git.infradead.org/~jmorris/selinux-2.6#fixes > Please apply these for 2.6.20 and they should probably be pushed to the 2.6.19 > stable tree as well; is there anything special I need to do for that? I'm not sure that they qualify. The first is a privileged operation, right? For the second, what are the implications of mapping to zero? Also review Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt. -- James Morris